- #1

- 1,631

- 4

we have to prove that

10+100+1000+10000+100000+.........=-(1/9)

any ideas?

10+100+1000+10000+100000+.........=-(1/9)

any ideas?

- Thread starter sutupidmath
- Start date

- #1

- 1,631

- 4

we have to prove that

10+100+1000+10000+100000+.........=-(1/9)

any ideas?

10+100+1000+10000+100000+.........=-(1/9)

any ideas?

- #2

- 410

- 12

10+100+1000+10000+100000+.........=-(10/9)

here is a "proof" :)

let

S = 10 + 100 + 1000 + 10000 + ...

then

10S = 100 + 1000 + 10000 + ...

now,

S - 10S = 10

=> -9S = 10

=> S = -(10/9)

=> 10 + 100 + 1000 + 10000 + ... = -(10/9)

- #3

- 1,631

- 4

i dunno maybe this is what i actually was looking for.

- #4

- 410

- 12

- #5

- 1,631

- 4

so Murshid_islam what is the deal here? I can see that the series does not converge, however where is the problem on your proof? Is there a mathematical error, cause i could not see it, or what can we say about this?

- #6

- 367

- 1

- #7

arildno

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

Dearly Missed

- 9,970

- 134

Because, in his expression for 10S, he ignored the largest term present there.

- #8

- 1,631

- 4

as long as we are talking for infinit large numbers i cannot grasp how could there be a larger number on 10S than on S.I think it is absurd to talk about a "largest"term here, as long as we deal with infinit large terms! however i do understand the error now. SO defenitely we can say that

10+100+1000+10000+100000+.........=-(10/9)

is not mathematically true, and i cannot count on it, right?

10+100+1000+10000+100000+.........=-(10/9)

is not mathematically true, and i cannot count on it, right?

Last edited:

- #9

HallsofIvy

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 41,833

- 963

Yes, I recommend that you not count on it!

- #10

- 195

- 1

why don't you use sum of infinite G.P?

- #11

- 1,631

- 4

can you tell me?

- #12

- 1,631

- 4

Yeah, i also thought it could not be negative. However i saw this on a tv scientific show, and a proffesor demonstrated this, so i just wondered how that would be possible. That proffesor, whose name i cannot remember, said that he had turned this for a mathematical test to prove that this is right. If ,at first place, this is exactly what i saw, couse i am not 100% posotive.I would have thought it obvious from the start that a sum of positive numbers cannot be negative!

!

- #13

- 2,063

- 2

G.P - Geometric Progression

can you tell me?

It is a series in which each term, apart from the first, is a fixed multiple of the previous term.

a + ar + ar^2 + ar^3 + ...+ar^n+...

The sum of the first n terms of such a series is a(1-r

- #14

- 1,631

- 4

thnx indeed.

- #15

- 1,631

- 4

- #16

- 2,063

- 2

Yes, it diverges.

But, as mentioned earlier, the thing that should first convince you that the statement is not true is that the a sum of positive numbers cannot give you a negative number.

- #17

- 1,631

- 4

yeah, thank you guys for your help.

- #18

- 410

- 12

the error was when i let S = 10 + 100 + 1000 + .....so Murshid_islam what is the deal here? I can see that the series does not converge, however where is the problem on your proof? Is there a mathematical error, cause i could not see it, or what can we say about this?

As the series doesn't converge i cannot let it equal to a number S.

- #19

- 453

- 0

- Last Post

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 6K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 8

- Views
- 7K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 21

- Views
- 10K

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 2K

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 2K