• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Interference in Thin Films

  • Thread starter killerfish
  • Start date
  • #1
16
0
Hi guys,

i have problem with Interference in Thin Films, i tried worked the solution not sure it is correct. Hope someone can help me check? Also there is some part on the topic i dont quite follow, 2t is the extra distance travelled inside the film, then is 2t is also rough estimate of wavelenth?


Homework Statement


A soap bubble (n = 1.33) is floating in air. If the thickness of the bubble wall is 115 nm,
what is the wavelength of the light that is most strongly reflected?


The Attempt at a Solution



the worked solution by me is in attachment.

dddd.JPG



Thank you.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
674
2
After a quick look through, it looks fine to me.

Also, 2t is related to the wavelength from the equation you just worked out. It is more directly related to the wavelength of the light inside of medium, n=1.33. But not exactly sure what you are asking.
 
  • #3
16
0
sry for the late reply...

1. for example, if the system give destructive result, i should sub in (m + 1/2)[tex]\lambda[/tex]n into [tex]\Delta[/tex] at the third line of equation ?

2. and you mentioned the 2t is relate to the wavelength, then we actually can use that to find the wavelength entered into the thin film using simple trigo rule?
 
Last edited:
  • #4
674
2
1. Yes, for destructive interference the path length difference needs to be that.

2. You already solved it, so not sure what else you are trying to do here.
 

Related Threads on Interference in Thin Films

  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
Top