Hello, I have a few questions about this interferometer setup, see attached picture.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The beamsplitters are 50/50 and the setup is symmetric.

initial

|i>

first beamsplitter, where U is unitary and represents the beamsplitter.

U|i> = 1/sqrt(2)( |u> + exp(ix)*|d> )

second beamsplitter, A and B are detectors (upper and lower)

U|d> = 1/sqrt(2)( |A> + exp(ix)*|B> )

U|u> = 1/sqrt(2)( |A> + exp(iy)*|B> )

now what is x and y? I let x = 0 and then assume that <d|u> = 0 and use this to determine y under the assumption that U is unitary this gives y = pi.

U|d> = 1/sqrt(2)( |A> + |B> )

U|u> = 1/sqrt(2)( |A> - |B> )

this gives the state after the second beamsplitter to be

1/sqrt(2)( 1/sqrt(2)( |A> + |B> ) + 1/sqrt(2)( |A> - |B> )) = |A>

and this gives probability of detection in A to be

|<A|A>|^2 = 1

and B

|<B|B>|^2 = 0

I have questions about this experiment.

1. How come its valid to assume that |u> and |d> are pure states?

2. Will the experimental outcome be different if we put up a wall on the horizontal symmetry line? Or wont that affect the experiment cause all the interference takes place at the second beamsplitter?

3. is possible to view the |u> (and |d>) as being pure states because they are sort of statistically pure as long as the paths are separated well enough? Has this anything to do with the statistical interpretation of QM ?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Interferometer questions, pure states?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**