Internet, what defines an addiction?

  • Thread starter BoulderHead
  • Start date

If time online defines addiction, what's a good amount to stay under?

  • 5 hours a week or less

    Votes: 1 20.0%
  • 10 hours a week or less

    Votes: 2 40.0%
  • 20 hours a week or less

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • it's too late now, I'm already addicted !!

    Votes: 2 40.0%

  • Total voters
    5
  • #1
BoulderHead
There is interesting man on TV with a bald head and beady eyes who goes by the name of Dr. Phil. He was telling a woman today (who spends over 20 hours per week on the internet) that she should invest these hours in her family (husband and daughter). That got me thinking about my own addiction, so I ask;

What defines an internet addiction to you, amount of time (and if so, how much time)?

Should we spend more time to brave the ‘real’ world?

.
.
.
...Somebody tell me Dr. Phil must have been joking!
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
BoulderHead
It's too late for me, folks.
You might want to get out now before it's too late for you too.
 
  • #3
LogicalAtheist
Absolutely no amount of time defines an addiction whatsoever.

The medical definition of addiction is as such:

Compulsive physiological and psychological habits that one continues to do despite the fact that this habit causes negativity in the rest of their life.

You could spend 8 hours a day (perhaps at work) using your computer. You still aren't addicted if you go home and eat dinner with your family, and have fun with kid and wife on the weekends.

Addiction to anything occurs when you can't stop doing it even when doing it is negatively effect your life.

Other remember that, properly, addiction only applies to physiological definition. It's now turned into psych as well but formerly was NOT included. However, our psyche is only electrochemical anyways so there's the opposing position.
 
  • #4
BoulderHead
Excellent, so as long as I remain convinced that my life is not being negatively affected, then, at least from my perspective, things might actually be ok.
 
  • #5
FZ+
1,561
3
Should we spend more time to brave the ‘real’ world?
.
.
.
...Somebody tell me Dr. Phil must have been joking!
Yep, he must have been. 'Real' world, haha. Everybody knows there is nothing outside the internet.
 
  • #6
Firstly, Dr. Phil rocks!

And if 20 hours a week is too much... then I'm in trouble!
I suppose though it's different for me in the sense that I don't have a husband or daughter to tend to (thankfully, for the time being)- like the lady that appeared on Dr. Phil.
Seeing as though I only have to worry about myself, I don't feel that I am addicted to the net, or anything else, simply because I spend so much time doing it. It's just what I feel like doing at that moment, so I'll do it.
 
  • #7
Zero
People will bandy about 'Internet addiction' while ignoring their useless 20-30 hours in front of the TV. As long as real life is always first, you're fine!
 
  • #8
3,762
2
Well, I only spend an hour per day (thus, 7 hours per week) on the internet, because that's all I'm allowed. Every once-in-a-while, I go a little bit over, but I usually stay in that time-frame. However, I don't think that makes me any less addicted. I experience a NASTY withdrawl, when I can't get on the PFs for even one day.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on Internet, what defines an addiction?

  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
363
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Top