In classical mechanics the Lagrangian is constructed as the difference between kinetic and potential energy, [tex]L=T-V,[/tex] and hence the physical interpretation is fairly straightforward when taken together with Hamiltons principle, i.e the system evolves "along the path of least resistance".(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

But now that I've started to study a little QFT I see that there the Lagrangian seems to be simply constructed as "the function that after applying Hamiltons principle gives the correct equation of motion". In other words, I don't see any obvious physical interpretation outside of being a lucky guess giving the correct result.

Have I missed something important here or is the Lagrangian just a mathematical tool and not something with a distinct physical interpretation like the Hamiltonian?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Interpretating the Lagrangian

Loading...

Similar Threads for Interpretating Lagrangian | Date |
---|---|

A Is there a local interpretation of Reeh-Schlieder theorem? | Apr 6, 2018 |

I QCD Lagrangian | Feb 28, 2018 |

I Classical chaos and quantum mechanics | Jan 16, 2018 |

Insights The Fundamental Difference in Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics - Comments | Jan 9, 2018 |

I Physical interpretation of a Hamiltonian with a constraint | Dec 14, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**