Is it justified to state that GR is "just" a geometrical theory to calculate the paths of objects in spacetime?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Just because GR states that "gravity is a property of spacetime itself" doesn't necessary mean that spacetime is curved; just that the paths of objects in spacetime are curved in a gravitational field.

What I'm after is that as we all know, GR is just an approximation of the yet-to-be-discovered quantum theory of gravity, which might not deal with the "geometry of spacetime" at all.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Interpretation of GR

Loading...

Similar Threads - Interpretation | Date |
---|---|

A Interpretation of covariant derivative of a vector field | Feb 15, 2018 |

A Hawking and Unruh effects -- Differences and interpretation | Aug 1, 2017 |

B An Interpretation of the Geometry of Space-Time Inside a BH | Mar 7, 2017 |

B GR interpretation of a scenario | Jan 31, 2017 |

A Interpretation of the derivative of the metric = 0 ? | Dec 22, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**