So I'm struggling if I should interpret the integral as a sum of infinitesimally small quantities or as just the antiderivative. I know these two things are equivalent but I can't think of those two things at the same time when I'm doing an integral.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The reason I find this troublesome is because it's giving a headache to mentally transform all the integrals I see into antiderivatives, instead of just thinking of it as an operation that adds differentials.

Specifically I'm calculating work done by variable forces along non-straight lines using integrals. If I consider these integrals as just sums then they're no big deal. But if I see them as antiderivatives of some mysterious function then it gives me a headache.

What do you think about this? What's your interpretation of the integral? If I don't think of it as an antiderivative then the limits of my integral seem (although not entirely) somewhat arbitrary.

Thanks

EDIT: Also, in a simple fashion: why does Leibniz notation allow algebra-like manipulations, and provide valid statements that way?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Interpretation of the integral

Loading...

Similar Threads - Interpretation integral | Date |
---|---|

Geometric interpretations of double/triple integrals | Jul 21, 2015 |

Insight into determinants and certain line integrals | Jun 9, 2015 |

Graphical interpretation of a double integral? | Apr 11, 2015 |

Interpreting path integral averages as measure integrals | Oct 25, 2012 |

Interpretation of integration | Oct 17, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**