Invariance of a Lagrangian

  • A
  • Thread starter Gaussian97
  • Start date
  • #1
Gaussian97
Homework Helper
683
406
TL;DR Summary
I've just read that for a Lagrangian to be Lorentz Invariant the Lagrangian density cannot have second or higher derivatives.
Last day in class, a professor told us that, for a Lagrangian to be Lorentz Invariant, the Lagrangian density cannot have second or higher derivatives. Is this true?
Because one can write the KG lagrangian as $$\mathscr{L}=\phi(\square + m^2)\phi,$$ which have second derivatives.

And, where can I find a proof of this fact?

Thank you
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,731
1,200
"I've just read..." where?

It's simply not true. You can perfectly write down Lorentz-covariant terms with higher order derivatives (e.g. look at the equations of motion, as you mention!)
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba and vanhees71
  • #3
PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2022 Award
24,028
15,721
Summary:: I've just read that for a Lagrangian to be Lorentz Invariant the Lagrangian density cannot have second or higher derivatives.

Last day in class, a professor told us that, for a Lagrangian to be Lorentz Invariant, the Lagrangian density cannot have second or higher derivatives. Is this true?
Because one can write the KG lagrangian as $$\mathscr{L}=\phi(\square + m^2)\phi,$$ which have second derivatives.

And, where can I find a proof of this fact?

Thank you

The Lagrangian density for the Klein-Gordon equation is
$$\mathscr{L} = \frac 1 2 (\partial_{\mu} \phi)^2 - \frac 1 2 m^2\phi^2$$
Which involves only first-order derivatives.
 
  • #4
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
20,004
10,660
The Lagrangian density for the Klein-Gordon equation is
$$\mathscr{L} = \frac 1 2 (\partial_{\mu} \phi)^2 - \frac 1 2 m^2\phi^2$$
Which involves only first-order derivatives.
Which is equivalent to the Lagrangian given by the OP by partial integration (and up to multiplication by a constant).
 
  • #5
haushofer
Science Advisor
Insights Author
2,731
1,200
What could help is to play around with the action of a nonrelativistic point particle, what kind of actions are possible, what the order of derivatives is and what kind of boundary conditions you need.

Just write down (via an inner priduct) some invariant combinations of the position, velocity, acceleration etc. and see what you get upon varying.
 

Suggested for: Invariance of a Lagrangian

Replies
57
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
353
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
651
Replies
33
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
834
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
404
Replies
10
Views
586
Replies
33
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Top