1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Inverse Faraday Cage?

  1. Jun 15, 2009 #1
    Well we can use a Faraday Cage to keep magnetic fields from entering a certain area, but I was wondering if the same method could work for containing magnetic fields.

    I know we use metal cores to concentrate magnetic fields, but is there a way to actually trap them?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 15, 2009 #2

    mgb_phys

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I think you mean a Faraday cage for electric fields.
    Yes you can make a shield from a low permeability metal to contain a magnetic field, the alloy used is called mu-metal. Although in practice it's trickier and not always as effective.
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2009
  4. Jun 15, 2009 #3
    Yes, electric fields. My bad.

    What makes this trickier then a regular faraday cage?
     
  5. Jun 15, 2009 #4

    mgb_phys

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Strong fields will saturate it.
    You have to make the screen almost air-tight to stop any fields leaking in (as you do with a Faraday cage) but any machining, hammering, cold-working of the metal will lose it's permeability so you need very careful handling and lots of re-annealing.
     
  6. Jun 15, 2009 #5
    A Faraday cage (e.g., copper screen or sheets) is good for dc and ac electric fields, and for only ac magnetic fields (in electromagnetic radiation). Mu-metal, often in separated layers, is required for dc and low frequency ac magnetic fields. Because of its very high mu, mu-metal is saturated by low B fields (longitudinal) and H fields (transverse), so layer(s) of soft iron are needed to reduce high B fields.
     
  7. Jun 15, 2009 #6
    That does seem a bit trickier.

    I ask because I have plans for a few summer projects to keep myself amused. One if them is a stereo system, and I want to isolate as much noise from the power supply as I can.

    I figure instead of building a cage around the rest of the system to keep fields out, why not just trap the fields in the power supply?

    Another is a Power bus that has circuits controlled by Triacs, and I want to keep the fields trapped in the power cords, and the device itself so that noise doesn't enter my microphone when I record.
     
  8. Jun 16, 2009 #7
    I have found that 1/r2 is a good shielding; put the power supply in another room and run dc to the stereo. I also found that using dc on the filaments of the preamp tubes (12AX7 hi-mu triodes) helped.
     
  9. Jun 16, 2009 #8
    My amplifier design uses an IC, not tubes. Although that would be kind of cool. I like working with older technology for some reason.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook