1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Inverse Functions and Logs

  1. Aug 24, 2005 #1
    I have a few problems that i need help with...

    Find the inverse of the function and verify that it is the inverse by performing a composition of functions both ways...

    1. f(x) = (2x + 1) / (x + 3)

    when i interchange x and y.. i can't seem to solve for y... because i have a y in the numerator and denominator...

    Draw the graph and determine the domain and range of the function.

    2. y = 2 ln (3-x) - 4

    when i graph this equation on a calculator.. it doesn't look like the range is all reals... but in the back of the book.. the answer says the range is "all reals"... why?

    3. y = log2(x+1)

    same problem with range here.. doesn't look like all reals.. but it is...

    Solve each equation algebraically.

    4. ex + e-x = 3

    I can't seem to work this out anyway i try.. the x's end up canceling out.. and i lose my variable altogether

    5. 2x + 2-x = 5

    same problem here as the previous question

    and lastly...

    Solve for y.

    6. ln (y - 1) - ln 2 = x + ln x

    I don't know where to go with that one at all...

    Thanks a lot in advance!
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 24, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    1. x = (2y+1)/(y+3)

    now cross-multiply and solve for y

    2. Domain is for x-values, range is for y-values
    As x gets very -ve (3 - x) gets very +ve and y gets very +ve. As x tends to -infinity, y tends to +infinity.
    As x tends towards 3, (3-x) tends towards zero and lnx (and hence y) tends towards - infinity.

    3. similar solution as above.

    4. substitute for u = e^x and see if that helps.

    5. similar solution as above.

    6. use x = x.ln(e) or, x = ln(e^x)
    Last edited: Aug 24, 2005
  4. Aug 24, 2005 #3
    ok.. this is where i get on the first one..

    x = (2y+1)/(y+3)

    x(y+3) = 2y + 1

    Then i can divide by x, but i don't think that helps me... i'm stuck there

    I have no idea what you're talking about in number 2 when you said -ve and +ve

    and i don't know what you mean when you say "substitute for u = e^x and see if that helps." in #4.

    Thanks for the help...
  5. Aug 24, 2005 #4
    you just expand the brackets and then put y outside the brackets .

    he means to solve the quadratic equation you get by making the subtitution of e^x=u

    so that u^2+3u+1=0

    +ve is positive and -ve is negatibe
  6. Aug 25, 2005 #5


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    You have a serious problem. If you can't solve an equation like x(y+3) = 2y + 1 for y then you are going to have major problems with logarithms. I recommend you go to your teacher and ask for suggestions to help you with basic algebra.
  7. Aug 25, 2005 #6

    yeah, and recall that e^(-x) is the same as 1/e^x

    (my first hunch was to use hyperbolic cosine! :eek: )
  8. Aug 25, 2005 #7


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Good idea. Faster than my substitution.

    And it has a neater solution.
  9. Aug 25, 2005 #8
    Hmmm. it doesnt seem to factor nicely. Am I doing something wrong here?

    whats that?
  10. Aug 25, 2005 #9
    yeah, probably. you should get a quadratic equation where you can solve for u using the quadratic formula.

    in fact, it's ALMOST that quadratic equation roger put in his post... except one of his signs is wrong. :tongue2:

    hyperbolic cosine is written as "cosh."

    cosh x := (e^x + e^(-x))/2

    (and, like the standard cosine, hyperbolic cosine has an inverse function with the usual property that the composition of the function and its inverse will get you back "x.")

    but... you won't need it to solve this problem, it turns out. the hyperbolic functions are pretty obscure--you typically won't even deal with them in the calc sequence!
  11. Aug 25, 2005 #10
    I did get all that... However, if I use the quadratic formula, the solutoin I get does not equal to three which is what I think it is suppose to equal as it states in the question...
  12. Aug 25, 2005 #11


    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Why must the solution equal to 3???? The solution x can be anything that satisfy:
    [tex]e ^ x + e ^ {-x} = 3[/tex]
    When you have found out x, just plug x in the equation and see if it returns 3. If it does, then you are correct.
    Just remember when you let [tex]u = e ^ {x}[/tex]
    And you have worked out the u that satisfied [tex]u ^ 2 - 3u + 1 = 0[/tex], you have to change the u back to x, ie:
    [tex]u = e ^ {x} \Leftrightarrow x = \ln u[/tex]
    Viet Dao,
  13. Aug 25, 2005 #12
    ahh I see. I dunno why I thought it must equal 3... Thanks much
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Inverse Functions and Logs
  1. Inverse functions (Replies: 8)

  2. Inverse function (Replies: 8)

  3. Inverse function (Replies: 1)

  4. Inverse function (Replies: 4)

  5. Inverse functions (Replies: 1)