Heya folks,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm currently pondering how to decide whether a function has an inverse Laplace transform or not. In particular I am considering the function e^(-is), which I am pretty sure does not have an inverse Laplace transform. My reasoning is that when calculating the inverse by the Bromwich Integral, integration is done along the contour Re(s) = c, where c is greater than the real part of all the singularities of e^(s(t-i)). Since this has no singularities, the integral cannot be evaluated. If this is right, then any function F(s) such that e^(st)F(s) is entire will not have an inverse transform and I was wondering if this is in fact the correct conclusion or if I'm missing something important

Thanks!

EDIT: I am finding plenty of counter examples to this, e.g. F(s) = 1 with f(t) = δ(t) the Dirac delta function, but I am still not sure how this fits into the Bromwich integral picture

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Inverse Laplace transform where e^(st)F(s) is entire

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**