Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Inverse of the curl

  1. Aug 14, 2010 #1
    I want to express A as a function of B in the following equation:

    curl{A}=B

    So I need the inverse of the curl operator, but I don't know if it exist.

    Thanks.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 14, 2010 #2
    It's called vector potential
     
  4. Aug 14, 2010 #3

    Redbelly98

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    There is no unique solution for A. You can always add a vector field of zero curl to one solution and get another solution.
     
  5. Aug 15, 2010 #4

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    If A= f(x,y,z)i+ g(x,y,z)j+ h(x,y,z)k then curl A = (h_y- g_z)i+ (f_z- h_x)j+ (g_x- f_y)k.

    If you are given that curl A= B= p(x,y,z)i+ q(x,y,z)j+ r(x, y, z)k then you must solve the system of equation h_y- g_z= p, f_z- h_x= q, g_x- f_y= r.

    Since those are partial differential equations, the "constants of integration" will be functions of x, y, z. That is why, as RedBelly98 says, "You can always add a vector field of zero curl".
     
  6. Aug 15, 2010 #5

    arildno

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Note that this non-uniqueness is not something that is a strange facet by the vector potential only.

    You know of it from before, as the so-called "constant of integration".
    When doing partials, functions of the other variables will be "constants" with respect to that variable you have differentiated with respect to.


    A far more important question, though, is, not uniqueness vs. non-uniqueness, but existence vs. non-existence of the vector potential(s)!

    Do you know, given B, how to be certain that at least one "A" exists?
     
  7. Aug 16, 2010 #6
    Consider the vector field defined by:

    [tex] \mathbf{A}(\mathbf{x}) = \int_0^1 \mathbf{B}(\lambda \mathbf{x}) \wedge (\lambda\mathbf{x})\, \mathrm{d}\lambda[/tex].

    You might like to show that if [tex]\nabla\cdot\mathbf{B}=0[/tex], then [tex]\nabla \wedge \mathbf{A} = \mathbf{B}[/tex]. Obviously this [tex]\mathbf{A}[/tex] is not unique.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar Discussions: Inverse of the curl
  1. Divergence and Curl (Replies: 3)

  2. Curl Test (Replies: 3)

  3. Divergence of the Curl (Replies: 2)

  4. Definition of curl (Replies: 4)

Loading...