The Attractive Power of the Inverse Square Potential: Do Examples Exist?

In summary, a "dipole" would be a pair of equal and opposite charges with some fixed separation. For example, a positive charge and an equal negative charge on opposite ends of an insulating stick.The net charge of this dipole is zero. And we can consider its location to be the midpoint between the two charges.Now add a fixed positive point charge at the origin of your coordinate system and have this dipole floating in space somewhere. One could use a negative point charge instead. It changes nothing. What is the force of the point charge on the dipole?Well, the dipole is going to rotate under the influence of the field so that the negative end faces the central
  • #1
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
1,104
960
Do exist examples of attraction forces with such a type potential
##V(\boldsymbol r)\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^2}, \quad |\boldsymbol r|\to 0##
in physics ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
wrobel said:
Do exist examples of attraction forces with such a type potential
##V(\boldsymbol r)\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^2}, \quad |\boldsymbol r|\to 0##
in physics ?
Just spit-balling here... An inverse square potential would imply an inverse cube force law. What do we have for inverse cube forces?

How about the electrostatic force on (or from) a dipole. That should scale as the differential of an inverse square, i.e. as an inverse cube.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and Dale
  • #3
Thanks. Actually I need physics examples at least such that
##V\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^n},\quad n\ge 2##
 
  • #4
jbriggs444 said:
How about the electrostatic force on (or from) a dipole. That should scale as the differential of an inverse square, i.e. as an inverse cube.
Excellent response. You could do arbitrary order multipoles to get any n>0 desired
 
  • #5
wrobel said:
Thanks. Actually I need physics examples at least such that
##V\sim-\frac{1}{|\boldsymbol r|^n},\quad n\ge 2##
I am not sure how the suggestion of a dipole fails to satisfy that requirement.

It is a net attractive force and consequently has a negative potential everywhere referenced to zero at infinity. So the sign is right. It approximates an inverse square potential. So the approximation is right (when r >> size of dipole). And n=2 which satisfies n>=2.
 
  • #6
Look up the "multipole expansion" used in molecular physics (for example, in the textbooks by Demtröder).

You get a ##-1/R^2## potential for ion-dipole interaction, ##-1/R^3## for dipole-dipole, ##-1/R^4## for ion-induced dipole, and so on.
 
  • #7
Thank you everybody so much!

It seems I still have some stupid questions. I have been thinking that dipole is the potential of the type ##V=\frac{\cos\varphi}{r^2}## (in polar coordinates) but this potential changes sign.
Could you please be more detailed?
 
  • #8
wrobel said:
It seems I still have some stupid questions. I have been thinking that dipole is the potential of the type ##V=\frac{\cos\varphi}{r^2}## (in polar coordinates) but this potential changes sign.
Could you please be more detailed?
In simple terms, a "dipole" would be a pair of equal and opposite charges with some fixed separation. For example, a positive charge and an equal negative charge on opposite ends of an insulating stick.

The net charge of this dipole is zero. And we can consider its location to be the midpoint between the two charges.

Now add a fixed positive point charge at the origin of your coordinate system and have this dipole floating in space somewhere. One could use a negative point charge instead. It changes nothing. What is the force of the point charge on the dipole?

Well, the dipole is going to rotate under the influence of the field so that the negative end faces the central charge and the positive end faces away. That means that your ##cos\varphi## term goes away.

Edit: Apologies for the length and the simple mindedness of the response. I was talking my way through it until I finally got to the point of understanding how you'd arrived at your formulation.
 
Last edited:
  • #9
wrobel said:
Thank you everybody so much!

It seems I still have some stupid questions. I have been thinking that dipole is the potential of the type ##V=\frac{\cos\varphi}{r^2}## (in polar coordinates) but this potential changes sign.
Could you please be more detailed?
Are you looking asymptotically for a spherically symmetric potential from a localized source ?
 

1. What is the inverse square potential?

The inverse square potential is a type of potential energy that follows an inverse square relationship with distance. This means that as the distance between two objects decreases, the potential energy between them increases exponentially.

2. How does the inverse square potential affect attractive forces?

The inverse square potential plays a major role in determining the strength of attractive forces between objects. As the distance between two objects decreases, the potential energy increases, leading to a stronger attractive force between them.

3. Can you provide examples of the inverse square potential in action?

Yes, there are many examples of the inverse square potential in everyday life. Some common examples include the gravitational force between two objects, the electric force between two charged particles, and the magnetic force between two magnets.

4. How does the inverse square potential relate to Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation?

The inverse square potential is directly related to Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, which states that the force of gravity between two objects is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

5. Is the inverse square potential only applicable to attractive forces?

No, the inverse square potential can also apply to repulsive forces. In this case, as the distance between two objects decreases, the potential energy increases, leading to a stronger repulsive force between them.

Similar threads

  • Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Differential Equations
Replies
0
Views
114
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
723
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
854
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
756
  • Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
926
Back
Top