of course if we know f(x) the function and is analytic near x=0 with this we could construct its Taylor series:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex] f(x)=a_{0}+a_{1}x+a_{2}x^{2}+............... [/tex]

but the problem is..what happens if we know the [tex] a_{n} [/tex] but not f(x)?..well using Cauchy,s formula definition of the a we have:

[tex] a_{n}=\frac{n!}{2i\pi}\int_{C}dzf(z)z^{-(n+1)} [/tex]

where z is a closed curve..if we choose C to be a circle or radius 1 the above formula becomes:

[tex] a_{n}=\frac{n!}{2i\pi}\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}dwf(e^{iw})e^{-iwn} [/tex]

wich is nothing but a Fourier transform so we could invert it to obtain [tex] f(e^{iw}) [/tex] and hence the function f(x)..but this is "correct"?..thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Inverting a Taylor series

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Inverting Taylor series | Date |
---|---|

Finding an invertable non-negative PDF from a biquadratic function | May 25, 2012 |

Complex Arcsin, inverting Sin | Oct 30, 2010 |

Inverting Consequences of Uniform Convergence | Jan 17, 2010 |

Inverting a derivative | Jan 12, 2010 |

Inverting a Taylor serie | Oct 26, 2005 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**