Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Iron Man Propulsion

  1. May 6, 2017 #1
    How does Iron Man flight propulsion work? It seems to be pure electrical, there are no jet fuels involved.

    What devices presently being contemplated by NASA that can produce propulsion purely on electricity that doesn't rely on fuels?
  2. jcsd
  3. May 6, 2017 #2


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Then why is there flame shooting out of the bottoms of his feet?

    The explanation I've heard it that it uses "repulsor technology" ... in other words, movie magic with nothing to do with physics.

    Very likely none since that would be impossible. Electricity alone would not produce any thrust. You DO I assume realize that the flying thing is a total fiction? It's great for the story but is not based on actual physics. I think one of the early comic book suits WAS based on science and used chemical thrusters but even that was ridiculous since the amount of thrust produced and the time for which it was produced was simply impossible given the size of the suit and the lack of any fuel packs on his back.
  4. May 6, 2017 #3
    Don't forget Tony Stark is a genius.. perhaps more intelligent than Einstein. We haven't even figured out his Arc Reactor yet.. which may be based on vacuum or dark matter technology... the repulsor technology may be based on vacuum engineering... maybe Area 51 is a Tony Stark secret government facility?

    Oh. What does the Marvel Universe say about Area 51?
  5. May 6, 2017 #4


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Yeah, you're probably right.
  6. May 7, 2017 #5


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Tony Stark's Arc Reactor is an infinite power supply unless there needs to be a plot twist. :oldwink:
    Who says it has to be NASA? This relies on fuel but it's the best one I've seen in our world so far.
  7. May 8, 2017 #6
    One thought would be an Ion Thruster similar to what NASA is using to position satellites... but the energy is too small so I imagine ionizing the oxygen surrounding the thruster with microwaves might be a better solution.

    Leik Myrabo of Rensselaer Polytechnic back in the late 1980's built a craft which used lasers (originally microwaves) to ionize and super heat oxygen (air) and explosively detonate below the craft which provided lift. The link below describes the technology behind it and you can also venture into Rensselaer into their archives for his advancements.

  8. May 8, 2017 #7
    If you want to learn about Iron Man's equipment from an in-universe perspective, you'd be better served looking elsewhere: http://marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Anthony_Stark_(Earth-616)#Paraphernalia
    Discussion of reactionless drives in non-fiction settings is prohibited site-wide as per the global guidelines: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/physics-forums-global-guidelines.414380/#post-3929007
  9. May 8, 2017 #8


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Either through the fictional "repulsor" tech, or through some other fictional propulsion method. The technical details aren't usually explained very well. I know I've never seen any explanation in any of my Iron Man comic books (though I don't have more than perhaps 15 or so). There's no real comparison to real technology.

    Personally I expect that they work off of a little-known technology called "plot-demandium", of which the technical profession is known as Applied Phlebotinum.

    Other than propulsion generated by sending EM radiation out the back end, none. But the thrust provided by these drives are exceedingly low. Far lower than even ion drives.
  10. May 8, 2017 #9
    He's not a genius, he is fiction. His intelligence, and the physics he uses are purely the imagination of the writers. Comparing him to any real physicist is frankly, insulting.
  11. May 8, 2017 #10


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Keep in mind which forum this is in :smile:
  12. May 8, 2017 #11
    There is a difference between enjoying fiction, and faulting real science for not keeping up with it. I mean:

    Who is the "we" in this sentence?
  13. May 8, 2017 #12
    I know nothing about Iron Man. But about this Tony Stark. Surely he is not in the same league as Zefram Cochrane. And he was drunk much of the time.
  14. May 14, 2017 #13
    Ain't that a great site? TV Tropes, that is. They seem to have upgraded their "look" but if it's the same site I'm thinking of, it's been around some years now; beautiful explication of genres, leading to a better understanding of storytelling in general. Every fan wiki could benefit by hard-wiring a link to TV Tropes into their top level menu.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Threads - Iron Propulsion Date
Interactive Holograms in Iron Man Oct 20, 2017
Arthur C Clarke's space ships -- propulsion discussion Feb 10, 2017
Iron Eagle Road of the gypsy Apr 14, 2016
Anyone see Iron Man 3D? May 3, 2013