Are we rewriting the birth of the solar system?

In summary, the conversation revolves around the topic of solar energetic particle events and the theories surrounding the formation of the sun and planets. The reference D. V. Reames and C. K. Ng, 2004 is mentioned and the idea of the sun being formed from the accretion of solid materials is discussed. The conversation ends with a question about why the sun couldn't have gone through a similar birthing experience as the planets.
  • #1
Andre
4,311
74
Anybody familiar with:

D. V. Reames and C. K. Ng, 2004; Heavy-Element Abundances in Solar Energetic Particle Events, The Astrophysical Journal, 610:510–522, 2004 July 20 ?

What is going on? Are we rewriting the birth of the solar system?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
I haven't read the reference but I'm going to the library right now.

I've always wondered about the apparently two separate theories regarding the genesis of our sun and the planets... those being that the sun was formed when a shock wave from a nearby exploding star compressed the gaseous nebula that once was and that the planets somehow managed to coalesce from weak gravitational accretion of solid material. Why not start the sun from the accretion of solid materials and go through a similar birthing experience as that for the planets. Accretion of solids leading to accretion of gas, a solar 'iron catastropy' resulting in its ignition resulting in a sun with an iron core?
 
  • #3


Based on the research and findings presented in the article by D. V. Reames and C. K. Ng, it does not seem that we are rewriting the birth of the solar system. Rather, their study focuses on the abundance of heavy elements in solar energetic particle events, which are bursts of high-energy particles that originate from the Sun.

The birth of the solar system refers to the formation of our Sun and its surrounding planets and other celestial bodies. This process is thought to have occurred around 4.6 billion years ago and has been extensively studied and accepted by the scientific community.

The study by Reames and Ng provides valuable insights into the composition of these solar energetic particle events, which can help us better understand the processes occurring within our Sun. However, it does not challenge or change the existing theories of the birth of the solar system.

In conclusion, while the research presented in the article is significant and adds to our understanding of the Sun, it does not have any implications for rewriting the birth of the solar system.
 

1. What is the birth of the solar system?

The birth of the solar system refers to the formation of our sun and the planets that orbit it. This process is estimated to have occurred approximately 4.6 billion years ago.

2. How do scientists study the birth of the solar system?

Scientists study the birth of the solar system by examining the composition and age of the planets and other celestial bodies, as well as through computer simulations and observations of other star systems.

3. Has our understanding of the birth of the solar system changed over time?

Yes, our understanding of the birth of the solar system has evolved as new evidence and technologies have become available. In recent years, discoveries such as exoplanets and the composition of asteroids have led to new theories and models.

4. Are we currently rewriting the birth of the solar system?

Yes, scientists are constantly gathering new data and refining their theories about the birth of the solar system. However, the basic principles and events of the formation of our solar system remain largely unchanged.

5. Why is studying the birth of the solar system important?

Studying the birth of the solar system allows us to better understand our own planetary system and its origins. It also provides insights into the formation and evolution of other planetary systems, giving us a broader understanding of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
21
Views
993
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top