1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

B Irrational inequality

  1. Oct 3, 2016 #1
    So I am trying to solve a simple rational inequality: ##\sqrt{x} < 2x##. Now, why can't I just square the inequality and go on my way solving what results? What precisely is the reason that I need to be careful when squaring the square root?
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 4, 2016 #2


    Staff: Mentor

    It's not so much the square root -- it's the simple fact of squaring both sides of an inequality.

    -2 < 1
    If you square both sides, you get 4 on the left side and 1 on the right side.
    Obviously, the direction of the inequality needs to change, since 4 > 1.
  4. Oct 4, 2016 #3


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    In this particular question, we know that both sides are non-negative, so there is nothing to worry about.
  5. Oct 6, 2016 #4
    Well, the signs are not an issue in this scenario, but if I don't pay attention to the fact that I am squaring, I get an extraneous result. For example, if we go from ##\sqrt{x} < 2x \implies x < 4x^2 \implies x(4x - 1) > 0##, which then gives us ##x > \frac{1}{4}## or ##x < 0##. However, ##x < 0## is obviously extraneous because of the square root in the beginning of the problem, which implies that x must be positive. Thus, what is it about squaring that causes the extraneous solution set to occur?
  6. Oct 6, 2016 #5


    Staff: Mentor

    Squaring both sides of an equation or inequality is not a one-to-one operation, so isn't reversible. Once you have squared something, you can no longer determine whether the thing that was squared was positive or negative.
    Leaving aside inequalities for the moment, consider ##\sqrt{x} = -2x##. Squaring both sides gives ##x = 4x^2## or x(4x - 1) = 0, with solutions x = 1/4 or x = 0. x = 1/4 is not a solution of the original equation. This extraneous solution arose because of the squaring operation.
  7. Oct 7, 2016 #6
    So would a hard and fast rule be to just proceed as normal (i.e. square both sides and solve for x), and then after all is said done, check back to see whether you have an extraneous answers?
  8. Oct 7, 2016 #7


    Staff: Mentor

    Yes, this is something you should do. This would also include raising both sides to the fourth or other even power.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted

Similar Discussions: Irrational inequality
  1. Irrational numbers (Replies: 24)

  2. An inequality (Replies: 11)

  3. Irrational numbers (Replies: 4)

  4. Irrational numbers (Replies: 19)