Okay, I was thinking about irrational numbers, and I came to this conclusion: It is impossible exactly measure an irrational number.I am probably wrong, and that's why I posted this thread to check the validity of that statement.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Here is my proof:

If you wanted to cut a piece of paper exactly 1.284736 cm, you would probably measure it to the tenths place (1.3) or the hundreths place (1.28). If you wanted to be even more exact, you could keep on going until the ten millionth place.

Now, suppose you wanted to cut this piece of paper exactly the square root of two.

As we all know, the sqrt(2) is approximately 1.414213562. I say "approximately" since this number goes on forever. Therefore, you can never get an EXACT measurement since you always have another number in the decimal that you haven't taken into account.

As I said before, I am probably very wrong about this statement.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Irrational Numbers

Loading...

Similar Threads for Irrational Numbers | Date |
---|---|

New irrational number to develop transcendental operators | Dec 27, 2013 |

How to find 'self locating digits' in irrational numbers | Aug 3, 2012 |

Two types of irrational numbers | Feb 12, 2012 |

Irrational Number Phenomenon | Aug 17, 2011 |

Computation of Continued Fractions of irrational numbers | Jun 21, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**