Is anyone here involved in MINOS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter arunma
  • Start date Start date
arunma
Messages
924
Reaction score
4
Is anyone here involved in MINOS? A couple of the graduate schools I've applied to have professors who are involved in this experiment, and I would be interested in becoming involved as a graduate student. So I'd be interested to hear about some of the results that have already come out of MINOS, and what projects will be looked at in the future.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jtbell said:
A Google search turns up links to MINOS web sites at Fermilab and U of Minnesota, among others, which should have information about recent developments:

http://www.google.com/search?q=minos+neutrino+oscillations

Interesting you mention the U of M. Actually I did my undergrad at the U of Minnesota, and I've applied to their graduate program as well. So I've heard a bit about MINOS during my time here. Do you know what other universities are involved in this experiment?
 
The first hit on the Google search results page that I referenced, is the MINOS site at Fermilab, which has on its home page a link to the following press release about recent results:

http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press_releases/minos_3-30-06.html

Near the bottom, you'll see a list of participating institutions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
jtbell said:
The first hit on the Google search results page that I referenced, is the MINOS site at Fermilab, which has on its home page a link to the following press release about recent results:

http://www.fnal.gov/pub/presspass/press_releases/minos_3-30-06.html

Near the bottom, you'll see a list of participating institutions.

Oh, I didn't see that. Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm involved in MINOS, although I'm relatively new to the experiment. My 'big picture' knowledge of the experiment doesn't go much beyond that press release, but I am currently learning about and doing work on Monte Carlo simulations of the detectors.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top