- #1
jk22
- 729
- 24
Bell writes for the result of measurement in A $$A (\theta_A,\lambda) $$.
It is said lambda could be any parameter.
I would like to interprete lambda and thought of two possibilities :
-$$\lambda=\phi $$ the angle of polarization of the photon arriving at A. This seems reasonable
-since lambda could be any parameter it could be : the coordinate of the universe in which result is A for the measurement setting given. Hence a many-worlds view.
Thus can we deduce from Bell theorem that if one wants to reproduce quantum results with MWI it should still use nonlocal formulas ? Hence MWI does not solve the nonlocality issue ?
It is said lambda could be any parameter.
I would like to interprete lambda and thought of two possibilities :
-$$\lambda=\phi $$ the angle of polarization of the photon arriving at A. This seems reasonable
-since lambda could be any parameter it could be : the coordinate of the universe in which result is A for the measurement setting given. Hence a many-worlds view.
Thus can we deduce from Bell theorem that if one wants to reproduce quantum results with MWI it should still use nonlocal formulas ? Hence MWI does not solve the nonlocality issue ?