Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Chemistry
Biology and Medical
Earth Sciences
Computer Science
Computing and Technology
DIY Projects
Trending
Featured Threads
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Chemistry
Biology and Medical
Earth Sciences
Computer Science
Computing and Technology
DIY Projects
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Other Sciences
Computing and Technology
Is chess fundamentally harder to "effectively" solve than Go?
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="apostolosdt, post: 6852511, member: 680181"] PAllen, thanks for the reminder, but I'm aware of the rules. Regarding the opening position, what experts do you have in mind? There is no theory proper in chess; the only "theorists", and experts for that matter, are the good players. Openings, statistics, and discussions among players indicate that White has a slight advantage, among others the first move and thus the opening for which he/she has been prepared---no need to expand on that. As for my last paragraph, yes, I should have been more accurate. I meant that, for a computer program to be declared superior over a human player in an official event, like the computer game olympiads for instance, the program should achieve at least a draw. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Post reply
Forums
Other Sciences
Computing and Technology
Is chess fundamentally harder to "effectively" solve than Go?
Back
Top