Is Communication the Key to Understanding Reality?

In summary, the necessary conditions for two independent observers to communicate are that they perceive the same causal structure and have a means of communicating with each other. This encoding of events allows for communication, which is essential for learning and understanding. Kant and Spinoza also recognized the importance of communication and observation in learning. Godel used Boole's product to show that the universe is Godel-finite, and that mass or energy must observe itself to exist. This corresponds to the idea that the universe is fundamentally a surface and anything in it must be 2-dimensional. Our space and time are a result of this cost of observation, and we must discard certain paths in order to keep the structure together.
  • #1
49
0
Apparently the only necessary condition for two observers who are "independent" so they communicate two events, is that they perceive the same causal structure and the same kind of events generally expected to have a lifetime in it.

So that they must also have a protocol or means of communicating with each other, so they commute the message each sends and "understand" it, there must be not only the same kind of dynamic is part of the same structure but a way to talk to each other about it.

So encoding is then any language that recognizes and conveys events between observers, for which we generally assume a minimum of two - although you need three observations to triangulate over a sphere.

However observers o and o' need the same three things for communications to occur, which is G,A the structure with algebraic states (messages, measures) in it, and the third is "will" or the encoding and transmission. We wrap information in packages and distribute it, because there is no other way to do it.

So ultimately, we slice space with time, or we "time" spaces; alternating with we slice time to distribute it over space. Observers can assume they see independent events and (all they can do is) communicate.

Kant, Spinoza, in fact said much the same thing, we can only look and agree, and so learn or attribute. We are "channels, with memory". There is no other result for the question "why" than "because it's all we can do", and for "how" than "because we took it apart and looked".

Godel used Boole's product: you cannot prove propositionally that a proposition is universally true or false, against you cannot prove a lie is false, to show that the universe is Godel-finite, or c-complete I think he termed it. And we can't halt because we can't prove that we can.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The latest ideas for conformal theories of this space or time "informational" structure, that together are a product (of the algebra of information A|{s,t}) which is the energy (in units of spacetime), is that mass or energy are always products of themselves.

Or that, mass, to exist, must observe itself. This corresponds to a free node in a graph generating a connected copy of itself, or a single disconnected vertex generates 'dimensionality' by being two of itself at once, in a connected way. The universe is fundamentally a surface, a surface and anything in that surface must necessarily be 2-dimensional, or bipartite.

Therefore, since we can draw such 2-color maps and connect them to 3, and higher numbers of colors, use contrast to section such colors, and mix or rotate them, then we create a space of sectioned colors we can mix, in a geometry. This is what our space or time, with energy means, or is our cost. We have to pay this cost by observing the changes, so we discard "paths through colored spaces, where we alter or re-color them to find a path" in order to keep the pattern together, or structure the edges so they meet at the right vertex, in L our mesh with the fabric, or our knot polynomial in time.
 
  • #3


I would respond by saying that communication is indeed a crucial aspect of understanding reality. In order for two observers to perceive and interpret events in the same way, they must have a shared understanding of the causal structure and the language to communicate about it. Without this shared understanding, it would be difficult for them to accurately communicate their observations and come to a mutual understanding of reality.

It is also important to note that communication involves not just the exchange of information, but also the encoding and transmission of that information. This process is necessary because it allows for the distribution of information over space and time, which are fundamental aspects of our experience of reality.

Furthermore, as you mentioned, many philosophers have also recognized the importance of communication in understanding reality. The fact that we are limited to our own perceptions and can only come to a mutual understanding through communication is a concept that has been explored by thinkers such as Kant and Spinoza.

In addition, the concept of Godel's incompleteness theorem highlights the limitations of our ability to fully understand and prove the truth or falsehood of propositions. This further emphasizes the role of communication in our understanding of reality, as it allows us to combine our individual perceptions and knowledge to come to a more comprehensive understanding.

Overall, as a scientist, I would agree that communication is indeed the key to understanding reality. It is through communication that we are able to share our perceptions, combine our knowledge, and ultimately come to a more complete understanding of the world around us.
 

1. What is communication and how does it relate to understanding reality?

Communication is the process of exchanging information or ideas between two or more individuals. It plays a crucial role in understanding reality because it allows us to share our perceptions, thoughts, and experiences with others, and in turn, gain a more comprehensive understanding of the world around us.

2. How does effective communication contribute to a better understanding of reality?

Effective communication involves actively listening, asking questions, and clarifying misunderstandings. By engaging in these practices, individuals can gain a deeper understanding of different perspectives, beliefs, and experiences, leading to a more complete understanding of reality.

3. Can communication ever hinder our understanding of reality?

Yes, communication can hinder our understanding of reality if it is not done effectively. Poor communication can lead to misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and biased information, which can distort our understanding of reality. It is essential to practice active listening and critical thinking to avoid these pitfalls.

4. How can communication help us navigate conflicting realities?

In today's world, conflicting realities are common due to individual perspectives, cultural differences, and media influences. Communication can help us navigate these differences by facilitating open and respectful dialogue, promoting empathy and understanding, and finding common ground between conflicting viewpoints.

5. Is communication the only key to understanding reality?

No, while communication is an essential aspect of understanding reality, it is not the only key. Other factors such as personal experiences, critical thinking, and empirical evidence also play a role in our understanding of reality. However, effective communication is a crucial tool that can enhance and strengthen our understanding of the world around us.

Suggested for: Is Communication the Key to Understanding Reality?

Replies
3
Views
622
Replies
5
Views
552
Replies
7
Views
578
Replies
4
Views
803
Replies
5
Views
923
Replies
11
Views
784
Back
Top