Is filling a football with helium really beneficial for hang time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bijanv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helium
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of filling a football with helium versus air, particularly focusing on the implications for hang time and flight dynamics. Participants explore the physics principles involved, including buoyancy, mass, and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the validity of the claim that helium increases hang time, discussing the relationship between the weight of the ball, buoyancy, and the forces acting on it. There are attempts to relate the concepts of force, mass, and acceleration to the scenario.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various viewpoints being expressed. Some participants suggest that the lighter helium ball may experience more buoyancy, while others raise concerns about the effects of air resistance and the overall weight of the football's cover. There is no clear consensus yet, but several lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the weight difference between air and helium in the context of a football may be minimal, and the majority of the ball's weight comes from its cover. There are also references to the need for experimental data to draw more definitive conclusions.

bijanv
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

in an article it states:

Football Myths:

"If you fill a ball with helium, it will have a greater hang time." Helium is lighter than air, but when a football is inflated to required pressures, the helium filled ball would be only a third of an ounce ligher.

Why is this true? What other info can I obtain from this/what info is missing/what is (in)accurate?

From what I can think of myself. The reason of why this would happen is that since helium is lighter, the force the helium particles are exerting on the football are much less of that of air therefore you will need to pump more helium into the football to receive that same amount of pressure that is required.

Am I correct on this statement?


Also would the helium even be able to help keep the football in the air for a longer period of time as apposed to a football filled with air? I mean the skin of the football is still pretty heavy, so would the helium be able to lift the football and counter the force of gravity on the ball even for a short period of time?

Any input would be appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT: Compare the weight of air molecules in a given volume with a given temperature with the weight of helium molecules in the same volume with the same temperature.
 
but this is to be more of a physics related question, so i don't think this would help that much although i will look into it

no one can even help start a discussion on this!?


another though... re-arranging F = ma we get a = F/m therefore if the football is thrown with the same force, but the mass of the ball is lighter, the ball will have greater acceleration which would cause a farther distance or hang time? is this correct?
 
Last edited:
bijanv said:
but this is to be more of a physics related question, so i don't think this would help that much although i will look into it

no one can even help start a discussion on this!?


another though... re-arranging F = ma we get a = F/m therefore if the football is thrown with the same force, but the mass of the ball is lighter, the ball will have greater acceleration which would cause a farther distance or hang time? is this correct?
The lighter helium ball experiences more buoyancy than the heavier air filled ball. This is just Archimedes principle. Since hang time depends on the net downward acceleration, the reduced downward force on the lighter ball (due to the upward buoyant force) reduces the downward acceleration and increases the hang time.

AM
 
Also, the flight medium is easier to travel through, so the football would move even more quickly.
 
Mk said:
Also, the flight medium is easier to travel through, so the football would move even more quickly.

I don't follow that. The flight medium is still air, the football still has the same size and shape. Why would filling a football with helium make the "flight medium" easier to travel through?

A crucial point here is "PV= NRT". Assuming same pressure, volume, temperature a football filled with helium would contain exactly the same number of helium atoms as one filled with air would contain air molecules. Heliums atomic weight is 4, nitrogen's (air is mostly nitrogen) is 14 so air would be approximately 14/4 or 3 1/2 times as heavy as helium (hmm, I don't remember whether He molecules are He2 or if Nitrogen is...).

Of course, it is quite possible that even the weight of air in a football is only a fraction of an ounce. Most of the weight of a football is in the cover.
 
B r I N Cl H O F
Those are the diatomic gases
 
IIRC, the effects of air resistance are like the inverse of the mass, so a less massive football would suffer more losses due to drag, thus not travel as far. But as Halls said most of the mass of a football is in the skin so all of these effects will be 2nd order, which means they may be barely measurable. Perhaps less of an effect then a wet or dry football.
 
great discussion thanks! i don't think there can be much more said about this unless there's thorough experimenting about this topic.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
18K