Is Gravity Dynamically Emergent From Wave Function Collapse?

In summary, the paper proposes a new length scale, the Compton-Schwarzschild length, that connects the Compton wavelength and the Schwarzschild radius for a point mass. It also suggests that gravity may be an emergent phenomenon from wave function collapse and calls for further research and exploration of these ideas.
  • #1
ohwilleke
Gold Member
2,560
1,520
A clever new paper explores the notion that the reduced Planck's constant in the quantum analogy to Newton's constant for macroscopic quantities though a hybrid quantity that generalized the Compton wavelength and the Schwarzschild radius. This allows for a linkage between the Einstein equations and the Dirac equation.

We have recently proposed a new action principle for combining Einstein equations and the Dirac equation for a point mass. We used a length scale LCS, dubbed the Compton-Schwarzschild length, to which the Compton wavelength and Schwarzschild radius are small mass and large mass approximations, respectively. Here we write down the field equations which follow from this action. We argue that the large mass limit yields Einstein equations, provided we assume wave function collapse and localisation for large masses. The small mass limit yields the Dirac equation.

We explain why the Kerr-Newman black hole has the same gyromagnetic ratio as the Dirac electron, both being twice the classical value.

The small mass limit also provides compelling reasons for introducing torsion, which is sourced by the spin density of the Dirac field. There is thus a symmetry between torsion and gravity: torsion couples to quantum objects through Planck's constant ℏ (but not G) and is important in the microscopic limit. Whereas gravity couples to classical matter, as usual, through Newton's gravitational constant G (but not ℏ), and is important in the macroscopic limit.

We construct the Einstein-Cartan-Dirac equations which include the length LCS. We find a potentially significant change in the coupling constant of the torsion driven cubic non-linear self-interaction term in the Dirac-Hehl-Datta equation. We speculate on the possibility that gravity is not a fundamental interaction, but emerges as a consequence of wave function collapse, and that the gravitational constant maybe expressible in terms of Planck's constant and the parameters of dynamical collapse models.

Tejinder P. Singh, "A new length scale, and modified Einstein-Cartan-Dirac equations for a point mass" (May 15, 2017).

The initial insight is that:

Compton wavelength and Schwarzschild radius for a point mass m have a peculiar relation to each other, in that their product remains constant at the square of Planck length, as the value of m is changed. Compton wavelength dominates Schwarzschild radius in the quantum regime m < mPl, and vice versa in the classical regime m > mPl. It seems a reasonable possibility that these two lengths are limiting cases of a unified expression for one length depending on mass, and having a minimum at around Planck length LPl.

What do folks think?

Are they onto something or too clever by half?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


As a fellow scientist, I find this proposal very intriguing and worth further investigation. The idea of a unified length scale that connects the Compton wavelength and the Schwarzschild radius is certainly intriguing, and it could potentially provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity.

The suggestion that gravity may not be a fundamental force, but rather an emergent phenomenon from wave function collapse, is also thought-provoking. It would be interesting to see if this idea can be tested experimentally or through further theoretical developments.

However, I do think that more research and evidence is needed before we can fully embrace this new length scale and its implications. It is always important to approach new ideas with a critical and open-minded perspective, and I believe that this proposal warrants further exploration and discussion among the scientific community.

Overall, I think this paper presents a clever and intriguing idea that could potentially lead to new insights and understanding in the fields of quantum mechanics and general relativity. I look forward to seeing how this proposal develops and how it may contribute to our understanding of the fundamental laws of the universe.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top