Is Gravity Dynamically Emergent From Wave Function Collapse?

In summary, the paper proposes a new length scale, the Compton-Schwarzschild length, that connects the Compton wavelength and the Schwarzschild radius for a point mass. It also suggests that gravity may be an emergent phenomenon from wave function collapse and calls for further research and exploration of these ideas.
  • #1
ohwilleke
Gold Member
2,366
1,359
A clever new paper explores the notion that the reduced Planck's constant in the quantum analogy to Newton's constant for macroscopic quantities though a hybrid quantity that generalized the Compton wavelength and the Schwarzschild radius. This allows for a linkage between the Einstein equations and the Dirac equation.

We have recently proposed a new action principle for combining Einstein equations and the Dirac equation for a point mass. We used a length scale LCS, dubbed the Compton-Schwarzschild length, to which the Compton wavelength and Schwarzschild radius are small mass and large mass approximations, respectively. Here we write down the field equations which follow from this action. We argue that the large mass limit yields Einstein equations, provided we assume wave function collapse and localisation for large masses. The small mass limit yields the Dirac equation.

We explain why the Kerr-Newman black hole has the same gyromagnetic ratio as the Dirac electron, both being twice the classical value.

The small mass limit also provides compelling reasons for introducing torsion, which is sourced by the spin density of the Dirac field. There is thus a symmetry between torsion and gravity: torsion couples to quantum objects through Planck's constant ℏ (but not G) and is important in the microscopic limit. Whereas gravity couples to classical matter, as usual, through Newton's gravitational constant G (but not ℏ), and is important in the macroscopic limit.

We construct the Einstein-Cartan-Dirac equations which include the length LCS. We find a potentially significant change in the coupling constant of the torsion driven cubic non-linear self-interaction term in the Dirac-Hehl-Datta equation. We speculate on the possibility that gravity is not a fundamental interaction, but emerges as a consequence of wave function collapse, and that the gravitational constant maybe expressible in terms of Planck's constant and the parameters of dynamical collapse models.

Tejinder P. Singh, "A new length scale, and modified Einstein-Cartan-Dirac equations for a point mass" (May 15, 2017).

The initial insight is that:

Compton wavelength and Schwarzschild radius for a point mass m have a peculiar relation to each other, in that their product remains constant at the square of Planck length, as the value of m is changed. Compton wavelength dominates Schwarzschild radius in the quantum regime m < mPl, and vice versa in the classical regime m > mPl. It seems a reasonable possibility that these two lengths are limiting cases of a unified expression for one length depending on mass, and having a minimum at around Planck length LPl.

What do folks think?

Are they onto something or too clever by half?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


As a fellow scientist, I find this proposal very intriguing and worth further investigation. The idea of a unified length scale that connects the Compton wavelength and the Schwarzschild radius is certainly intriguing, and it could potentially provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity.

The suggestion that gravity may not be a fundamental force, but rather an emergent phenomenon from wave function collapse, is also thought-provoking. It would be interesting to see if this idea can be tested experimentally or through further theoretical developments.

However, I do think that more research and evidence is needed before we can fully embrace this new length scale and its implications. It is always important to approach new ideas with a critical and open-minded perspective, and I believe that this proposal warrants further exploration and discussion among the scientific community.

Overall, I think this paper presents a clever and intriguing idea that could potentially lead to new insights and understanding in the fields of quantum mechanics and general relativity. I look forward to seeing how this proposal develops and how it may contribute to our understanding of the fundamental laws of the universe.
 

1. What is the theory behind the relationship between gravity and wave function collapse?

The theory proposes that gravity is not a fundamental force but emerges from the collapse of the wave function, which determines the position and movement of particles in the universe. This means that gravity is not a property of space-time but is a result of the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics.

2. How does this theory explain the effects of gravity on large-scale objects?

According to the theory, the collapse of the wave function occurs on a larger scale for larger objects, resulting in a stronger gravitational force. This is because larger objects have a greater number of particles, leading to a higher probability of wave function collapse and thus a stronger gravitational pull.

3. Can this theory be tested and verified through experiments?

At present, there is no experimental evidence to support this theory. However, scientists are conducting research and experiments to test its validity and explore its implications. It is a highly debated topic in the scientific community, and further research is needed to fully understand the relationship between gravity and wave function collapse.

4. How does this theory relate to other theories of gravity, such as general relativity?

This theory offers a new perspective on the nature of gravity, challenging the idea that it is a fundamental force. It proposes that gravity is a byproduct of the underlying quantum mechanics of the universe. However, it is not yet fully integrated with other theories of gravity, and more research is needed to reconcile these different perspectives.

5. What are the potential implications of this theory on our understanding of the universe?

If this theory is proven to be true, it would have significant implications for our understanding of the fundamental laws of the universe. It would also require a paradigm shift in our understanding of gravity and how it affects the behavior of matter on a large scale. This could potentially lead to new discoveries and advancements in science and technology.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
482
Replies
59
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
187
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
625
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
842
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top