Is homosexuality less moral than heterosexuality outside of marriage?

  • #1
3,077
4
Are heterosexuals who fornicate as morally culpable as homosexuals who do?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
16
All depends on ones definition of morality i suppose
 
  • #3
3,077
4
I realized that unmarried and active straight couples like my girlfriend and I may be the next targets of the intolerant zealots. Remember that you heard it here.
 
  • #4
Pengwuino
Gold Member
4,989
16
Loren Booda said:
Remember that you heard it here.
And a million other places
 
  • #5
Kerrie
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
827
15
morality is subjective, there is no absolutely right or wrong answer...marriage is ultimately a relationship that holds a status in our society as sacred, therefore making it easy for others to pass "judgment". those are the people who need to ask themselves, "do i have any right to judge another?"
 
  • #6
wolram
Gold Member
4,267
557
Loren Booda said:
I realized that unmarried and active straight couples like my girlfriend and I may be the next targets of the intolerant zealots. Remember that you heard it here.
May be we should get rid of all the zealots, heard them all together on an island, surly then that island could be called hell.
 
  • #7
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
132
Loren Booda said:
Are heterosexuals who fornicate as morally culpable as homosexuals who do?
Eeh, whatever legitimate sources of morality have ever said that sex outside marriage (i.e, fornication) is wrong???
 
  • #8
loseyourname
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
1,749
5
This isn't much of a philosophical question without at least some rudimentary arguments being thrown back and forth. Why exactly do you believe moral zealots look down upon fornication outside of marriage? What types of marriage qualify? What are their presuppositions? How can they be attacked and undermined, rather than dismissed intuitively?
 
  • #9
3,077
4
1. Moral zealots would look down upon fornication because of practical considerations - a greater chance of unwanted pregnancies, STDs and a perceived breakdown of societal structure - in theological clothes.

2. & 3. Marriage and its presuppositions, as defined by zealots, would conform to the "Defense of Marriage Act." See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Marriage_Act" [Broken]

4. These would be attacked and undermined by the history of "abnormal" relationships practiced by the majority of society, and by marriage being primarily a religious and moral contract (violated by a majority under such), vs a biological and pleasurable imperative.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
Rade
I think the answer to the OP depends on the definition of fornification. Are we talking about procreation or just individual sexual pleasure ? If the first, then only heterosexual fornification can be moral, if the second, then both heterosexual and homosexual activities would be equally moral.
 
  • #11
arildno
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
9,970
132
Fornication has the precise definition of sex outside of marriage.
 

Related Threads on Is homosexuality less moral than heterosexuality outside of marriage?

  • Last Post
5
Replies
115
Views
8K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
3
Replies
66
Views
4K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Top