Is it really necessary for an Experimental Physicist to learn General Relativity?

  • Thread starter kratos
  • Start date
  • #1
5
0
Hi, I am in my 3rd year and have General Relativity as one of my options.

I'm kind of feeling the peer pressure of selecting General Relativity, but putting all the hype aside, is it really necessary to learn General Relativity for an Experimental Physicist?

I have to say, maths isn't really one of my strong points, but I hear tensor calculus is quite different to what one is used to in normal physics based maths?

Will tensor calculus do me any good outside General Relativity/research/or even in the workplace?

Thanks
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
cgk
Science Advisor
521
42
Unless you intend to do experiments in general relativity there is no need to take it.
Note that this is not restricted to experimentalists. Also in >99% of the theoretical work done, gravity is not handled at all, or at the level of "F = m * g".
 
  • #3
Andy Resnick
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
7,583
2,234
Hi, I am in my 3rd year and have General Relativity as one of my options.

I'm kind of feeling the peer pressure of selecting General Relativity, but putting all the hype aside, is it really necessary to learn General Relativity for an Experimental Physicist?
<snip>

You didn't say what your other options are, so I can't say if a general relativity course is the best option for you. Education is about broadening your intellect- the mathematical and conceptual underpinnings of general relativity can also be applied to continuum mechanics, for example.
 
  • #4
5
0
You didn't say what your other options are, so I can't say if a general relativity course is the best option for you. Education is about broadening your intellect- the mathematical and conceptual underpinnings of general relativity can also be applied to continuum mechanics, for example.

Hi, The other options clashing with General Relativity are JAVA and Physics of the Earth.

If I don't choose GR, just wondering which of the two modules would be more worth it in the long term as I'm still undecided in what I want to do after I graduate.
 
  • #5
901
3
Both of the other classes would be easier and physics of the earth sounds alot more interesting.
 
  • #6
80
0
Hi, I am in my 3rd year and have General Relativity as one of my options.

I'm kind of feeling the peer pressure of selecting General Relativity, but putting all the hype aside, is it really necessary to learn General Relativity for an Experimental Physicist?

I have to say, maths isn't really one of my strong points, but I hear tensor calculus is quite different to what one is used to in normal physics based maths?

Will tensor calculus do me any good outside General Relativity/research/or even in the workplace?

Thanks

Sure, you obviously won't be directly applying general relativity to most experiments. That being said, taking a class that possess that level of difficulty will simply make you smarter and broaden your intellecual capacity. Which other classes can you take?
 

Related Threads on Is it really necessary for an Experimental Physicist to learn General Relativity?

Replies
3
Views
624
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
12K
Replies
14
Views
583
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Top