Is My Schedule too Crazy?

  • Thread starter carboy79
  • Start date
  • #1
36
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

Hey everyone, sorry in advance for the lengthy post (at least vertically). In a nutshell, I've already received a bachelor's degree in political science, but have decided to go back to undergrad to receive a physics degree since it's my passion. Since I'm already behind schedule, I'm hoping to receive my degree in 2 years, and I'll be able to do so if I follow the following schedule... but is it too demanding/too much to handle?

Fall

General Physics II
Calc III
Differential Equations
Computer programming (learning basics of C++)

Spring

Intermediate Mechanics
Intermediate Modern Physics
Intermediate Lab
Mathematical Physics
Thermal Statistical Physics


Fall

Intermediate E&M
Quantum Mechanics I
Advanced Lab
Particle and Nuclear Physics
Linear Algebra

Spring

Quantum Mechanics II
Advanced Dynamics
Optics
Complex Analysis (Or another useful math class)


Also, on a side note, I'm contemplating a degree in math as well, which would require basically taking 3 math classes in each summer following these semesters... any thoughts on that? I'm eventually hoping to go to grad school. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated... thanks. Also keep in mind that I'm hoping to find research positions with professors or something similar, which would take up some of my time as well.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
246
0
Hi,

In terms of academic load, the schedule is fine.
But I don't think that having Quantum Mechanics I along at the same Particle Physics is a good idea (this depends on the content of the Particle Physics lecture), as typically QM I is a prerequisite for particle physics.
 
  • #3
465
1
The only way you can really find out is by trying it. Some people can handle that much, some people can handle more, some people need less. There's no 'one-size-fits-all'.
 
  • #4
Gib Z
Homework Helper
3,346
5
Personally I took a heavy load this semester and unfortunately I didn't do as well in each subject as I wish I did, or know I could have if I took a smaller load. Going through the Degree early is nice, but you shouldn't harm your potential marks in any way, especially if you want to get into grad school.
 
  • #5
172
1
The second Fall semester looks like it might be a little crowded. Is it possible to move the Linear Algebra up to a summer or winter semester? I don't know about your school, but at mine, E&M and Quantum are two of the most difficult subjects offered.
 
  • #6
Choppy
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
4,587
1,679
Maybe I'm missing something. That looks like a couple of standard years out of a physics degree. In two of the semesters you've only listed four courses, so presumably you're planning on filling out the spare time with some electives.

Also - two years? Unless your system is different, an undergradute degree is ususally awarded based on completed credit-hours of course work. Only two years of a standard course load won't be sufficient to graduate. Hence it appears that you're assuming you will receive credit for some courses taken during your previous degree - I would urge you to make absolutely sure that you can do that.
 
  • #7
The only part that seems slightly crazy is doing calc III concurrently with ODEs. Never heard of that being done.
 
  • #8
Gib Z
Homework Helper
3,346
5
Yea, I thought it was odd doing EM and QM just as you learned Linear Algebra.
 
  • #9
92
0
don't get burned out.
 
  • #10
36
0
The second Fall semester looks like it might be a little crowded. Is it possible to move the Linear Algebra up to a summer or winter semester? I don't know about your school, but at mine, E&M and Quantum are two of the most difficult subjects offered.

Yes I could take Linear Algebra during the Summer before these two classes... which I was thinking about doing because I heard that you should have a good knowledge of Linear algebra before taking quantum. This is just a hypothetical schedule.... i could move some things around here and there... but not much because some of these classes are only offered in spring or fall, and so i have to take them then.
 
  • #11
36
0
Maybe I'm missing something. That looks like a couple of standard years out of a physics degree. In two of the semesters you've only listed four courses, so presumably you're planning on filling out the spare time with some electives.

Also - two years? Unless your system is different, an undergradute degree is ususally awarded based on completed credit-hours of course work. Only two years of a standard course load won't be sufficient to graduate. Hence it appears that you're assuming you will receive credit for some courses taken during your previous degree - I would urge you to make absolutely sure that you can do that.
Since I've already received a degree, I have completed all necessary electives and general education courses, and thus can just focus on physics classes. This schedule that I posted is sufficient to graduate with a BS in physics. I don't really care that much about anonymity, so if it makes any difference, my first degree is from University of Florida, and I'm going to attend Florida State University for physics
 
  • #12
34
0
If possible, although it's not a big deal actually, differential equations is more useful in physics than linear algebra (although linear algebra does have applications to physics, diffy equations is even more so).
 
  • #13
cristo
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
8,107
73
Since I've already received a degree, I have completed all necessary electives and general education courses, and thus can just focus on physics classes.
How can you have classes that are counting for two degrees? That doesn't seem right!
 
  • #14
34
0
How can you have classes that are counting for two degrees? That doesn't seem right!
Major in mathematics AND physics, or mathematics and computer science, or chemistry and physics, or english and journalism, or....
 
  • #15
465
1
If possible, although it's not a big deal actually, differential equations is more useful in physics than linear algebra (although linear algebra does have applications to physics, diffy equations is even more so).
I don't completely agree with this. At the undergraduate level, you can get through upper division classical mechanics and electrodynamics and thermodynamics only having a vague notion of what a differential equation is. Knowing how to check an ansatz is all you really need. On the other hand, doing well in quantum mechanics is very dependent on your knowledge of linear algebra and being very comfortable with almost everything you'd learn in a linear algebra class. You can get through electrodynamics not knowing what a system of first-order ODEs is, but you're not going to get through quantum mechanics if you understand what eigenvectors are.

Sure, differential equations are used in more classes than linear algebra, but the majority of the differential equations you'll run into in undergraduate level physics classes are ones you would be able to solve after week 1 of a differential equations class.
 
  • #16
172
1
How can you have classes that are counting for two degrees? That doesn't seem right!
I don't know about the OP's school, but the University I attend has the following policy:

A maximum of 90 transferable credits of undergraduate course work will be applied toward the second bachelor's degree. In addition, students must complete a minimum of 30 credits in residence at TU and meet all the requirements of the “new” major. At least one-half of the “new” major credits must be completed at Towson since the completion of the first degree. Each student must complete an advanced writing course. All other General Education requirements are considered to have been met through the first degree.
From: http://towson.edu/physics/physics/PHYS_SECDEG.asp
 
  • #17
601
0
How can you have classes that are counting for two degrees? That doesn't seem right!
The idea is that with two degrees you should know as much as if you combined two persons who took degree A and degree B. Both of these could have taken the same gen ed and such, so the only difference is the actual degree requirement which is why it isn't strange at all to have transferable credits.
 
  • #18
284
5
I don't think it's a good idea to take particle and nuclear physics together with QM (also move Linear algebra up, because that's needed in QM). Both particle and nuclear physics lean heavily on QM. Depending on how far the course goes in particly physics you will encounter some quantum field theory, so then you'll need a good understanding already of non-relativistic QM.

For nuclear physics this is not such a problem. You'll only need basic QM and that you'll learn in a few courses allready.
 
Last edited:
  • #19
36
0
I don't think it's a good idea to take particle and nuclear physics together with QM (also move Linear algebra up, because that's needed in QM). Both particle and nuclear physics lean heavily on QM. Depending on how far the course goes in particly physics you will encounter some quantum field theory, so then you'll need a good understanding already of non-relativistic QM.

For particle physics this is not such a problem. You'll only need basic QM and that you'll learn in a few courses allready.
You may be right that I'd be better off taking this course later, but according to my university the only prerequisites for this class are Differential Equations and Introduction to Modern Physics. Here is the description given by the school: "This course examines the properties of nuclei and particles, nuclear and particle decays, the Standard Model, and accelerator and detector techniques."



And to those who were wondering how credits from one degree transfer to another degree... it's pretty self explanatory. For example a person who is majoring in Art history and a person who is majoring in Mathematics are both required to take a certain amount of elective and general education classes. Since I've already completed all those classes, I only have to complete the required physics classes in order to receive a bachelors degree.
 
  • #20
601
0
I don't think it's a good idea to take particle and nuclear physics together with QM (also move Linear algebra up, because that's needed in QM). Both particle and nuclear physics lean heavily on QM. Depending on how far the course goes in particly physics you will encounter some quantum field theory, so then you'll need a good understanding already of non-relativistic QM.

For particle physics this is not such a problem. You'll only need basic QM and that you'll learn in a few courses allready.
It is obviously an overview course since otherwise you would never combine nuclear and particle physics in a single course. Also I think that your last sentence refers to nuclear rather than particle physics...
 
  • #21
284
5
It is obviously an overview course since otherwise you would never combine nuclear and particle physics in a single course. Also I think that your last sentence refers to nuclear rather than particle physics...
I've corrected it.

If it's an overview course, then it's not a problem. But I would think that an overview is already included in Intermediate modern physics?
 
  • #22
601
0
If it's an overview course, then it's not a problem. But I would think that an overview is already included in Intermediate modern physics?
But why else would you combine the topics? I think that it is more like a nuclear physics course with an introduction to particle physics since I think that they don't do particle physics much at all in any general modern physics course. Doing particle physics properly is a tough course in itself and on a whole different level than nuclear physics so why would anyone ever come with the idea to combine those topics in one course unless you mostly do the particle physics that relates somewhat to nuclear?
 
  • #23
284
5
We did a fenomenologic part in our general modern physics course. Next were two seperate courses on nuclear physics and particle physics. Although it seems highly unlikely that they would combine those two in one course indeed.
 
  • #24
42
0
I suppose the curriculum is going to vary from school to school, but here is my experience.

ODE is absolutely essential for all non-intro physics. There's nothign wrong with taking ODE at the same time as Calc III (that's actually how OU has it set up). It would be extremely helpful to complete Linear Algebra before Quantum Mechanics though, as it is vital (though at OU, Linear Algebra isn't required for physics; I took it as part of my math major. I don't know how anyone else survived quantum without it).
 
  • #25
57
0
Yeah I took ODE and Calc III together; also Linear Algebra on top of these two. It did not conflict at all, got A's on all of them, it was an enjoyable semester having three maths.
 

Related Threads on Is My Schedule too Crazy?

  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
991
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
961
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Top