Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Is SR necessary for GR?

  1. May 26, 2016 #1
    Hi,

    When I started learning about GR I wondered if it emerged from SR (which the name suggests) or if the connection between the two is mere technical. GR describes the behaviour of the metric of space-time, which is locally Minkowskian and therefore SR applies.

    But is a curvature-based theory of gravity possible where the metric is locally Euclidean, i.e. the speed of light is not constant and space and time are essentially uncoupled?

    Or is there a closer relation between GR and SR that I am missing?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 26, 2016 #2

    ShayanJ

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

  4. May 26, 2016 #3
    We need to locally arrive at a situation where the laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames, because that is what we empirically observe. This is not really possible if you uncouple space from time, and consider only a Euclidean metric; as such, the connection is more than merely technical, it is empirical.
     
  5. May 26, 2016 #4
    True, but I was thinking about putting electrodynamics aside for the moment and just considering gravity. It's more of a hypothetical question.
     
  6. May 26, 2016 #5

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    As @Shyan mentioned this is Newton Cartan theory.

    I don't have a rigorous proof of this, but my impression is that any theory in which the inertial mass equals the gravitational mass can be geometrized.
     
  7. May 27, 2016 #6

    haushofer

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Is SR necessary for GR?
  1. Learning SR and GR (Replies: 8)

  2. SR vs GR simultaneity (Replies: 4)

Loading...