Is the direction of spin changed by measurement?

In summary: Ok, so if you prepare the state ##| \!\!\nearrow \rangle_z## and perform a measurement in the ##z##-direction, the probability to measure spin down is 25%. You can't just chose special measurement directions for your explanation, you need to... explain why the spin down state is more likely to be found.You need to explain why the spin down state is more likely to be found.
  • #1
Jilang
1,116
72
I have been under the impression that application of a magnetic field will quantise the z component of an electrons spin in that direction. I see this as a physical process, but Is this incorrect as it is often described as a measurement of a random variable/ wavefunction collapse? I am familiar with the arguments of the Bell Inequality and appreciate how they would apply if the application of a magnetic field altered nothing, but am struggling to see how an application of a field would be assumed to have no effect on the initial state. Any insights would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Before the interaction with the magnet, you have a single beam. Afterwards, you have two beams. So certainly, the state of the particles is altered.

Initially, the spin state and the spatial wavefunction are independent. After the interaction, you have entanglement: if a particle is detected in the upper part of the detector, its spin state is up. If it is detected in the lower part, its spin state is down.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
  • #3
After entanglement the state of the particle is no more a pure state. It is the eigenstate of no hermitian operator. There is one exception: when the SG is oriented along le direction of the initial spin state. the repeated measurement does not alter the first output.
 
  • #4
If your initial state of your atom is a pure state then just running through a magnetic field still keeps it in a pure state.

A pure state is defined as a state, whose statistical operator is a projection operator
$$\hat{\rho}=|\psi \rangle \langle \psi|$$
with some normalized state vector. Unitary time evolution maps a projector into a projector, and thus a pure state stays a pure state.
 
  • #5
I was talking about the entanglment with the SG apparatus with its screen
 
  • #6
How is the SG apparatus entangled with whatever screen? An SG apparatus essentially consists of a static inhomogeneous magnetic field with a large homgeneous component, leading to an entanglement between position and spin-projection state in direction of the magnetic field.
 
  • #7
What you said is valid in classical physics. You can talk about static devices and of particles in an external field. In QM particles interact with the external field. and there is no static device.
When a subsystem evolves while interacting with another subsystem, there is a unitary time evolution but it acts on the global system.
Take the case of the "static" Young screen with two slits.
It can be decribed with two orthogonal vector; Its ground state |Y0> and its excited state |Ye> when a photon is captured.
The photon at the slit can be described with 3 orthogonal vectors |S1>, |S2> and |S3> (in front of slit 1 or 2 or somewhere else)
At the beginning we have the tensor product of Y0 and of a superpositon S1,S2 andS3.
A unitary interaction maps this to ##Y0> \otimes(aS1> +bS2>) + Ye>\otimes c S3>##
After interaction, the photon is in a mixed state of## |S_0>< S_0|## and ##(|S_1> + |S2>)(<S_1|+<S2|)##
We can also place the SG device behind the Heisenberg cut and have the same thing.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
kith said:
Before the interaction with the magnet, you have a single beam. Afterwards, you have two beams. So certainly, the state of the particles is altered.

Initially, the spin state and the spatial wavefunction are independent. After the interaction, you have entanglement: if a particle is detected in the upper part of the detector, its spin state is up. If it is detected in the lower part, its spin state is down.
I agree with that. So if the application of the field alters the state (and I am supposing also the spin directions) why are we surprised that the correlations in the SG experiment are greater than we would expect if the angles of spin were fixed in a given direction?
 
  • #9
Jilang said:
So if the application of the field alters the state (and I am supposing also the spin directions) [...]
Ah, I didn't get that this is what you are interested in from your initial post.

Ok, let's suppose we send a particle in state ##| \! \uparrow \rangle_x## through an SG-apparatus oriented in ##z##-direction. The probability to observe ##| \! \uparrow \rangle_z## is 50%. So the interaction with the SG-magnet at least doesn't simply align the spin magnetic moment with the magnetic field gradient deterministically.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
Thanks, but why would that be any different than to say suddenly applying a gravitational field to line of prepared coins all at slightly different angles to the vertical? Would not half fall as heads and half fall as tails?
 
  • #11
How would you apply this logic to the state ##| \!\! \nearrow \rangle##?
 
  • #12
I would rotate the whole setup by 45 degrees.
 
  • #13
Let me expand: if you prepare the state ##| \!\! \nearrow \rangle_z## and perform a measurement in the ##z##-direction, the probability to measure spin down is 25%. You can't just chose special measurement directions for your explanation, you need to explain what happens for all possible angles.
 
  • #14
I think you are saying that it wouldn't work for 30 degrees or 60 degrees. Is that correct?
 
  • #15
Yes.

On the other hand, it is a bit difficult for me to tell what exactly "it" is because you didn't elaborate much. I'm not interested in leading an endless discussion here. If you want to talk about why some classes of models don't work, please specify such a model in more detail so that there's something tangible to discuss.
 
  • #16
OK, thanks for your responses.
 

1. What is the direction of spin?

The direction of spin refers to the direction in which an object rotates or spins around its axis.

2. How is the direction of spin measured?

The direction of spin can be measured using various techniques, such as using a gyroscope or observing the rotation of an object over time.

3. Can the direction of spin be changed?

Yes, the direction of spin can be changed by applying an external force or torque to the object, causing it to rotate in a different direction.

4. Does measurement affect the direction of spin?

In most cases, measurement does not affect the direction of spin. However, in quantum mechanics, the act of measurement can cause the direction of spin to change due to the phenomenon of quantum entanglement.

5. What is the significance of understanding the direction of spin?

Understanding the direction of spin is important in many scientific fields, such as physics and engineering. It is also crucial in applications such as navigation, where the direction of spin of objects like compasses and satellites must be accurately determined.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
17
Views
915
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
925
Replies
41
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top