Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Is there a phase space in GR?

  1. Aug 2, 2011 #1

    BWV

    User Avatar

    can you construct (or if yes, is it regularly done) a Hamiltonian in curved spacetime? If you took a system and moved it into a strong gravitational field or accelerated it to relativistic speeds can you still do Hamiltonian mechanics?

    [URL]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/8/d/6/8d65ea399bf81fbc3c9ca911c44cd9f3.png[/URL]
    (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_coordinates)

    would it then follow that this commutation relationship (with the addition of time) would give you the metric tensor?
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 26, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 2, 2011 #2

    Ben Niehoff

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    In any theory with a Lagrangian (i.e., most theories, including physics in curved spacetimes), you can define conjugate momenta, take a Legendre transformation, and thereby define a Hamiltonian.

    However, in relativistic theories, you will run into a problem: The Hamiltonian constructed in this way vanishes identically! The crux of the problem is that time is now a coordinate rather than an evolution parameter.

    The solution to the problem is to choose a specific frame; i.e. choose a specific time coordinate to be your evolution parameter, and define Hamiltonian mechanics in the usual way on the remaining spacelike coordinates. This works in flat spacetime and it can be shown that the equations of motion remain Lorentz-invariant (even though the Lorentz symmetry is no longer manifest, as it is in Lagrangian mechanics). I think it can be made to work in curved spacetime, too, although I haven't seen it specifically.
     
  4. Aug 2, 2011 #3

    dextercioby

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Flat spacetime allows you to perform a Hamiltonian analysis, for its background R^4 can be seen as an R-infinity of R^3. Thus picking a specific time slice, t_0, you can retrieve the classical R^3 as configurations space, hence R^3 x R^3 as its cotangent bundle.

    A cumbersome topology of a curved spacetime introduces, I think, terrible complications to the flat space scenario. A Hamiltonian for GR was, however, written down in 1962 by Arnowitt, Deser & Misner.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Is there a phase space in GR?
  1. Phase space for GR (Replies: 0)

  2. SR/GR Space-Time (Replies: 1)

  3. Space dilation in GR (Replies: 9)

  4. GR on Banach spaces. (Replies: 6)

Loading...