arildno said:Impotence certainly exists; many men suffer from it.
<<<GUILLE>>> said:If you are asking about fisical existence, then no: it is impossible to exist without occupying space (but again, it also depends on your definition fo the opposite of omnipotent. For me, it is that something is nowhere).
Omnipotence (literally, "all power") is power with no limits or inexhaustible, in other words, unlimited power. This trait is usually attributed only to God.
PIT2 said:I found this definition of omnipotence on wikipedia:
So i think the opposite of omnipotence would be "something with no power whatsoever".
The opposite of omnipotence is impotence or powerlessness. It refers to the lack of ability or strength to accomplish or control something.
Some argue that the concept of omnipotence by definition means having unlimited power, so it would be impossible for something to be truly opposite to it. However, others believe that the idea of impotence or powerlessness can be seen as the opposite of omnipotence.
This is a highly debated topic. Some argue that if something is truly omnipotent, it would have no limitations. However, others believe that even an omnipotent being may choose to limit itself in certain situations.
It is not possible for humans to attain omnipotence as it is considered to be an attribute of a divine being. However, some people may possess great power or influence, but it would not be considered omnipotence.
No, omnipotence is a concept that exists within philosophical, religious, and theological discussions. It is not a scientifically measurable phenomenon, so there is no scientific evidence to support its existence.