Is this a mistake in Steven Weiberg's QFT II textbook?

  • Thread starter Osiris
  • Start date
  • #1
20
0

Main Question or Discussion Point

I guess it should be my mistake somewhere. o:)
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521670543/?tag=pfamazon01-20

On Page 30, for the derivation of EQ. (15.7.19), the nilpotency of BRST operator on the ghost for gauge transformation,

[tex]\delta _{\theta}s\omega_\alpha &=& - \frac{1}{2}C_{\alpha\beta\gamma}\delta_\theta(\omega_\beta\omega_\gamma)
&=&\frac{1}{4}\theta (C_{\alpha\beta\gamma}C_{\beta\delta\epsilon}\omega_\delta\omega_\epsilon\omega_\gamma ++ C_{\alpha\beta\gamma}C_{\gamma\delta\epsilon}\omega_\beta\omega_\delta\omega_\epsilon)=...
[/tex]

The plus "++" above, I suppose it should be "-" considering [tex]\omega[/tex] is an anticommuting ghost and the BRST operator is odd and acting from left. Steven also mentioned this in the paragraph below Eq. (15.7.19).


Did I miss any point here? Since then we would not have nilpotency of BRST operator on the ghost.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Answers and Replies

Related Threads for: Is this a mistake in Steven Weiberg's QFT II textbook?

Replies
157
Views
24K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
657
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
882
  • Last Post
9
Replies
212
Views
30K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
2K
Top