Is this right?, conservation of energy!

  • Thread starter sg001
  • Start date
  • #51
134
0
It can still be cleaned up some. Drop the zero and use the fact that -ln(b/a) = +ln(a/b).

Ok so I have now

R = L (ln(M/M-m)) = x
 
  • #52
gneill
Mentor
20,925
2,866
Ok so I have now

R = L (ln(M/M-m)) = x

That looks much neater.
 
  • #53
134
0
That looks much neater.

Thanks again gneil!
 
  • #54
134
0
sorry gneill!
 

Related Threads on Is this right?, conservation of energy!

Replies
7
Views
602
A
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
45
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
987
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
944
  • Last Post
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
954
Top