- #1

Eugene Shubert

- 22

- 0

1/ds^2 = 1/dt^2 – 1/(dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)

Eugene Shubert

http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Mathematica
- Thread starter Eugene Shubert
- Start date

- #1

Eugene Shubert

- 22

- 0

1/ds^2 = 1/dt^2 – 1/(dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)

Eugene Shubert

http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity

- #2

isn't that just

ds^{2} = dt^{2}- (dx^{2}+dy^{2}+dz^{2})

?

ds

?

- #3

Eugene Shubert

- 22

- 0

Eugene Shubert

http://www.everythingimportant.org/relativity

- #4

Brad_Ad23

- 502

- 1

- #5

Yes I do remember elementary algebra, good for me. you can invert that equation.

- #6

plus

- 178

- 1

- #7

Considering

- 75

- 0

I thought flipping a fraction such as 1/3^2 would result in 3^-2.

Doesn't it change the exponent?

Doesn't it change the exponent?

- #8

C'mon guys...

1/ds^{2} = 1/dt^{2} – 1/(dx^{2} + dy^{2} + dz^{2})

1/ds^{2} = (dx^{2} + dy^{2} + dz^{2} - dt^{2})/[ (dx^{2} + dy^{2} + dz^{2})(dt^{2}) ]

ds^{2} = [ (dx^{2} + dy^{2} + dz^{2})(dt^{2}) ]/(dx^{2} + dy^{2} + dz^{2} - dt^{2})

Which just doesn't look any cleaner.

edit: changed to using integrated superscript.

1/ds

1/ds

ds

Which just doesn't look any cleaner.

edit: changed to using integrated superscript.

Last edited by a moderator:

- #9

plus

- 178

- 1

Originally posted by suffian

C'mon guys...

1/ds^{2}= 1/dt^{2}– 1/(dx^{2}+ dy^{2}+ dz^{2})

1/ds^{2}= (dx^{2}+ dy^{2}+ dz^{2}- dt^{2})/[ (dx^{2}+ dy^{2}+ dz^{2})(dt^{2}) ]

ds^{2}= [ (dx^{2}+ dy^{2}+ dz^{2})(dt^{2}) ]/(dx^{2}+ dy^{2}+ dz^{2}- dt^{2})

Which just doesn't look any cleaner.

edit: changed to using integrated superscript.

That was my point.

- #10

Eugene Shubert

- 22

- 0

I’m thinking of ds as an invariant that represents a differential increment of proper time. That would imply that the total amount of elapsed proper time t' would equal t/sqrt (1-1/V^2) where V^2 = (dx/dt)^2 + (dy/dt)^2 + (dz/dt)^2. I would interpret V^2 > 1 to be a superluminal velocity.

Share:

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 579

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 499

- Replies
- 11

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 1K

Mathematica
Tag Times is Protected

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 16K

- Replies
- 1

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 3K

- Replies
- 9

- Views
- 1K