In my physics textbook there is a theorem that goes "If x1(t) and x2(t) are both solutions of a linear homogeneous d.e., then x(t) = x1(t) + x2(t) is also a solution."(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I need to know if the inverse is true, i.e. If x(t) = x1(t) + x2(t) is a solution, does it implies that x1(t) and x2(t) are also solutions separately.

I tried to do a proof similar to that of the first theorem but I come to (for the case of a second order d.e. and using f(x) = g(x) + h(x) instead of x(t) = x1(t) + x2(t)):

[a2*d²g/dx² + a1*dg/dx + a0*g] + [a2*d²h/dx² + a1*dh/dx + a0*h] = 0

of course [a2*d²g/dx² + a1*dg/dx + a0*g] = 0 and [a2*d²h/dx² + a1*dh/dx + a0*h] = 0 is a solution but maybe it's [a2*d²g/dx² + a1*dg/dx + a0*g] = -[a2*d²h/dx² + a1*dh/dx + a0*h] too, right?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Is this theorem true?

Loading...

Similar Threads for theorem true | Date |
---|---|

A Intermediate Axis Theorem - Lyapunov's Indirect Method | Mar 20, 2018 |

I Sturm-Liouville Separation theorem | Oct 3, 2016 |

Problem in understanding some theorems about second order linear differential equations | Dec 28, 2015 |

Is this equation ever true? | May 31, 2015 |

Convolution theorem for Laplace Transform proof | May 5, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**