Is Vaporising Someone Considered Murder?

In summary, vaporization is the transition from liquid to gas and cannot be applied to humans. The closest equivalent is cremation, which involves the combustion, vaporization, and oxidation of a body. Therefore, cremating a living person would be considered murder in almost all societies. Additionally, upon vaporization or cremation, a person is considered physically dead as they no longer have any vital bodily functions and their body no longer exists. Any discussion of their status on a philosophical level is irrelevant in this context.
  • #1
tommfreeman1801
1
0
1. Considering that not too many people have been vaporised, would you say it is murder?2. Because they are not alive anymore, does that necessarily mean they are dead? Forgetting religion, would you say having every single atom in your body separated would be death? Or Inanimation? I don't want to look at this on a philosophical level, but are they physically dead?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Vaporisation is the transition from liquid to gas.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporization

Not all of a human is liquid so you can't vaporise people, the closest you can get is cremation:
Cremation is the combustion, vaporization and oxidation of dead bodies to basic chemical compounds, such as gases, ashes and mineral fragments retaining the appearance of dry bone.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cremation

It should be quite obvious cremating living people most definitely counts as murder.
 
  • #3
tommfreeman1801 said:
1. Considering that not too many people have been vaporised, would you say it is murder?

Yes, in essentially every society on Earth that knows what vaporization is, vaporizing a person would count as murder.

tommfreeman1801 said:
2. Because they are not alive anymore, does that necessarily mean they are dead? Forgetting religion, would you say having every single atom in your body separated would be death? Or Inanimation? I don't want to look at this on a philosophical level, but are they physically dead?

Yes. Keep in mind that life, as it applies to a human being and every known form of living organism, is defined as something similar to the following: Life is a characteristic distinguishing physical entities having biological processes (such as signaling and self-sustaining processes) from those that do not,[1][2] either because such functions have ceased (death), or because they lack such functions and are classified as inanimate.

Their body no longer exists, meaning every reasonable definition of 'life' no longer applies to their constituent components. They are physically dead in every respect. Thread locked before metaphysical/philosophical content creeps in.
 
  • #4
Wanted to add one more point: a doctor pronounces someone dead upon the cessation of all vital bodily functions such as heartbeat, brain activity and breathing. Since a vapourised person isn't doing any of these they are obviously dead.
 

1. Is vaporising someone murder?

The answer to this question depends on the context and definition of murder. In most legal systems, murder is defined as the intentional and unlawful killing of another human being. If someone is intentionally vaporised, it could be considered murder if it is done without justification or legal authority. However, if vaporisation is done in self-defense or as a form of capital punishment, it may not be considered murder.

2. Can someone be vaporised without their consent?

Yes, someone can be vaporised without their consent if it is done as a form of punishment or in a situation where their consent is not required, such as in war or during an execution. However, if someone is vaporised without their consent in a non-justifiable situation, it would be considered a violation of their human rights.

3. Is vaporising someone more humane than other forms of execution?

This is a subjective question and opinions may vary. Some may argue that vaporisation is a quick and painless form of execution, while others may argue that it is a cruel and inhumane way to end someone's life. Ultimately, the answer to this question depends on personal beliefs and values.

4. Can someone be brought back to life after being vaporised?

Currently, there is no scientific evidence to suggest that someone can be brought back to life after being vaporised. However, with advancements in technology and medicine, it is impossible to predict what may be possible in the future.

5. Are there any ethical concerns with vaporisation as a form of punishment?

There are certainly ethical concerns surrounding the use of vaporisation as a form of punishment. Some may argue that it goes against the value of human life and that it is a violation of human rights. Others may argue that it is a necessary form of punishment for certain crimes. Ultimately, the ethical implications of vaporisation as a form of punishment are a complex and ongoing debate.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
911
Replies
4
Views
703
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
Back
Top