Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

[itex]e^{x} > x[/itex]

  1. Dec 25, 2011 #1
    When you see the graphs of the functions [itex]f(x)=e^{x}[/itex] and [itex]f(x)=x[/itex] it is obvious that the former is always greater than the latter (when x is a real number) for the portion of the graph you are observing. In elementary algebra, this was the "proof" that the following inequality is true for all real numbers x: [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex].

    By using calculus, you can prove that that the inequality [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] is true for all real number x. One method is to employ the properties of exponents to show that [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] for real numbers less than or equal to 0 and then show that [itex]e^{x} \leq x[/itex] results in a contradiction when you let x increase without bound. Another method, which is much simpler than the first, is to show that the power series of [itex]e^{x}[/itex] necessarily implies [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] for all real numbers x.

    Is it possible to prove [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex] for all real numbers x without resorting to calculus? Can you use elementary algebra to prove it? Is the previous question not possible because the function [itex]e^{x}[/itex] is transcendental?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 25, 2011 #2

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    As you noted the exponential function is not algebraic, so algebra can't be used by itself. The simplest was is using the power series for x > 0 and note that for x < 0, the exponential is still positive.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: [itex]e^{x} > x[/itex]
  1. Solution of e^x = x (Replies: 17)

  2. ∫ e^(x^x) dx (Replies: 10)

Loading...