[itex] (\gamma ^{\mu} )^T = \gamma ^0 \gamma ^{\mu} \gamma ^0 [/itex] identity proof

  • Thread starter LayMuon
  • Start date
  • #1
LayMuon
149
0
Can anyone help me in proving the following identity:

[tex]

(\gamma ^{\mu} )^T = \gamma ^0 \gamma ^{\mu} \gamma ^0

[/tex]

I understand that one can proceed by proving it say in standard representation and then proving that it's invariant under unitary transformations. this last thing is the one that I am not able to prove.

Are there other ways to go?

Thanks.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #3
Bill_K
Science Advisor
Insights Author
4,157
202


LayMuon, There are several matrices like the one you're seeking:

μA-1 = - (γμ)
μB-1 = (γμ)~
μC-1 = (γμ)*

and so on. You can express each of them as a specific product of gamma matrices in the standard representation, or any other given representation, but it will not hold when you go from one representation to another. Generally we just treat them as an independent matrix and let it go at that without trying to write them in terms of the gammas.
 
  • #4
LayMuon
149
0


I think you rather want to prove
[tex](\gamma^{\mu})^{\dagger}=\gamma^0 \gamma^{\mu} \gamma^0.[/tex]
For an intro to the Dirac equation and all that, see

http://fias.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/publ/off-eq-qft.pdf

No, I can prove the one with dagger, I need the proof for the transposed version. Bill is saying it's representation dependent. Dagger version is not, I am not sure about the transposed version. Judging from my textbook it should be representation independent too.
 
  • #5
LayMuon
149
0


Bill, this post is a follow-up of my previous one, I need this identity to prove the charge conjugation relation in my way. I had a look at the equations you brought in Bjorken and Drell.
 
  • #6
andrien
1,024
32


you should better start with the anticommutation relation followed by gamma matrices and treat γ0 as a single case when μ=0 and how the hermitian conjugate of different gamma matrices is defined.Like γ0 is hermitian in one representation then it's hermitian conjugate is γ0 itself but in other representation it may not be but the relation will prove the consequence.
 

Suggested for: [itex] (\gamma ^{\mu} )^T = \gamma ^0 \gamma ^{\mu} \gamma ^0 [/itex] identity proof

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
716
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
712
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
770
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
14K
Top