New Housing Devs: Why Cul-De-Sacs Required?

  • Thread starter tribdog
  • Start date
In summary, cul-de-sacs are required in new housing developments to promote car use and reduce traffic.
  • #1
tribdog
769
17
New housing developments in this area are not allowed to be made of nothing but straight streets. For every n houses in a development there must be at least x cul-de-sacs. Why are cul-de-sacs being required now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Peace and quiet? You get less traffic in a cul-de-sac.
 
  • #3
that is incorrect.
the peace and quiet may be nice, but that is not why cul-de-sacs are required
 
  • #4
Oh, this was an actual brain-teaser? I don't know, to deny enemy airplanes landing strips?
 
  • #5
It's sort of a brain teaser, because when I heard the answer I said wow, makes sense, why didn't I think of that
 
  • #6
Been looking online and the main other positive thing they say about cul-de-sacs is they promote car use.
 
  • #7
This is not related to the danger of terror attacks, is it ?
 
  • #8
I don't even know for sure if my answer is the correct one, but I was told by a life flight helicopter pilot that cul-de-sacs are required to make sure there is always a nearby place that a helicopter can land.
 
  • #9
Oooo...makes sense... sort of.
When I used to live on a cul-de-sac people sued to park in the middle all the time though. And forget about winter, there was allways a massive snow hill on the centre that the snow plows made. That'd be neat to see a helicopter try to land on that.
 
  • #10
Did you know that every fifth mile of federal highway must be straight to provide landing strips for airplanes in case of emergency?
 
  • #11
10:10
Well, I assumed it was more of a math/geometry/topology problem.

i.e. If there are bendy streets, maybe it's impossible to lay out a pattern that has lots the same size without some of the streets being dead-ends.

10:14
Wait a minute. "For x houses". All the bendy streets will have more houses on one side than the other (unless they curve twice, cancelling out). Cul-de-sacs make up the difference, since they provide more hourse per unit of street than a regular house does.

I think I'm on the right track, but I don't have it yet.

10:17
No, it can't be right, it still would have had to stipulate some constraint on the lot sizes/shapes, wouldn't it?

10:18
Unless can be just assumed that, in a new housing development, all lots are designed to have the same area (if not the same shape).

10:19
Nope, still doesn't work. You can always make the lots the same area if you don't have to worry about the shape. You can make em longer and narrower.

10:20
Oh wait. Tribdog already provided the answer.
Um. Nevermind.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Bartholomew said:
Did you know that every fifth mile of federal highway must be straight to provide landing strips for airplanes in case of emergency?
That's a common misconception. Here's an article from Richard Weingroff, an information liaison specialist with the Federal Highway Administration. (He seems awful touchy for an information liaison specialist. Not only does he hate it when people ask him about the emergency landing strips, he hates it when people ask him what an information liaison specialist is).

http://geography.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.tfhrc.gov/pubrds/mayjun00/onemileinfive.htm

If you think about, you would need more than just a straight stretch of road. You'd also need that stretch to be free of obstructions like overpasses, signs, and telephone poles.

I don't know about the helicopter landing area requirement, but that sounds a little iffy, as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #13
By the way, cul-de-sacs are actually going out of favor among urban developers. The primary reasons for them were relevant in the 50s and 60s. Not so much anymore. Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) will be back.
 
  • #14
Gokul43201 said:
By the way, cul-de-sacs are actually going out of favor among urban developers. The primary reasons for them were relevant in the 50s and 60s. Not so much anymore. Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) will be back.

That's a shame. Cul-de-sacs are the best places to live IMO.
 
  • #15
That's a common misconception.
Oh, darn. You know, I got that from the NY Public Library desk reference calendar. A myth with aspirations of upward mobility, it seems.
 

1. Why are cul-de-sacs required in new housing developments?

Cul-de-sacs are required in new housing developments for several reasons. One of the main reasons is to reduce traffic and promote a safer environment for residents. Cul-de-sacs are dead-end streets that allow for less through traffic, making it safer for children to play and reducing the risk of accidents. Additionally, cul-de-sacs can help reduce noise and pollution levels in the community.

2. Do cul-de-sacs increase property value?

Yes, cul-de-sacs can increase property value in new housing developments. Due to their location and limited traffic, cul-de-sacs offer a sense of exclusivity and privacy, making them desirable for homebuyers. This can lead to higher property values and potentially a higher return on investment for homeowners.

3. Are there any disadvantages to having cul-de-sacs in a community?

While there are many benefits to having cul-de-sacs in a community, there can also be some disadvantages. One potential disadvantage is that cul-de-sacs can limit access to main roads, making it more difficult for residents to access amenities or commute to work. Additionally, cul-de-sacs may increase response times for emergency vehicles.

4. How do cul-de-sacs affect traffic flow?

Cul-de-sacs can significantly impact traffic flow in a community. As dead-end streets, they limit through traffic and can help reduce congestion in the area. However, they may also result in longer travel times for residents as they have to navigate through the cul-de-sacs to reach their destination.

5. Are there any alternatives to cul-de-sacs in new housing developments?

Yes, there are alternatives to cul-de-sacs in new housing developments. Some alternatives include loop roads, grid patterns, and T-intersections. These options may provide more efficient traffic flow and easier access to main roads. However, they may not offer the same level of privacy and safety as cul-de-sacs.

Similar threads

Objects in house moved-need some logical explanation
    • General Discussion
Replies
24
Views
4K
Have you ever revisited your childhood home and found it unrecognizable?
    • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
1K
Photo Contest - It Costs An Arm And A Leg (8/24-8/30)
    • General Discussion
Replies
19
Views
2K
Did a Fellow PF Member Start a Campaign to Reinstate Pluto as a Planet?
    • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
3K
Photo Contest - Our House, In The Middle Of The Street (5/10-5/16)
    • General Discussion
Replies
10
Views
3K
MHB My Failed University Life: Addictions, Depression, and Uncertain Future
    • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
899
A Ballentine on the "multicomponent state function"
    • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
854
Calculating energy requirements to sustain temperature
    • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
928
Photo Contest - MURRAY GELL-MANN (6/8-6/14)
    • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Why don't we bury Schrodinger's Cat?
    • Quantum Physics
5
Replies
143
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top