- #1
IcedCoffee
- 21
- 4
Hi. I'm having trouble with calculating
(8.59)
from (8.58)
(## \vec H_{//} ## is simply ## \vec H ## in Jackson, but that shouldn't matter.)
in Jackson. Specifically I think I'm not sure about parallel component of H field here.
For example, shouldn't I have two terms for the TE case in that
when ## \hat n = \hat x ## (for simplicity), ## \hat n \times \vec B =
- B_z \hat y + B_y \hat z
= B_z \hat y + \frac {ik} {\mu \epsilon \omega^2 - k^2} \frac { \partial B_z } {\partial y} \hat z ## (from 8.26b)
(which, by the way, does not include ## \frac {\partial B_z} {\partial x} ## as in Jackson)
And similarly, shouldn't TM mode have only one term since ## B_z## is zero in TM mode?
(8.59)
from (8.58)
in Jackson. Specifically I think I'm not sure about parallel component of H field here.
For example, shouldn't I have two terms for the TE case in that
when ## \hat n = \hat x ## (for simplicity), ## \hat n \times \vec B =
- B_z \hat y + B_y \hat z
= B_z \hat y + \frac {ik} {\mu \epsilon \omega^2 - k^2} \frac { \partial B_z } {\partial y} \hat z ## (from 8.26b)
(which, by the way, does not include ## \frac {\partial B_z} {\partial x} ## as in Jackson)
And similarly, shouldn't TM mode have only one term since ## B_z## is zero in TM mode?