Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Jame's Box Hoax

  1. Jun 22, 2003 #1
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 23, 2003 #2
    Some of us knew it was a hoax back in December...
     
  4. Jun 23, 2003 #3
    How did you judge it is a hoax.
     
  5. Jun 24, 2003 #4
    It could still be true, but very very unlikely.
     
  6. Jun 24, 2003 #5
    There were about a half-dozen good reasons to discount it as real. The patina was questionable. The source of the ossuary was shady, and there is no reliable record of its origin. The 'front' of the box was decorated, but the carvings were done on the back. The carvings and decoration also show a differing level of aging, with the words being of a much more recent vintage than the carved adornment. The inscription itself is off-center, hinting that a later carver chose a relatively smooth and undamaged section to forge the writing on. The inscription itself seems to be it two different writing styles, suggesting that the 'brother of jesus' part was added at a later time.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Jame's Box Hoax
  1. James Bond (Replies: 1)

  2. James Randi (Replies: 81)

  3. Robot hoax (Replies: 2)

  4. UFO Hoax Revealed (Replies: 4)

Loading...