Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

[shogun338]

and defy gravity?

Fuel bundles blown up and around during explosion then super heats and melts, flows to the side . How would that defy gravity ?

 

[Joe Neubarth]

and defy gravity?

First I get a thought suggested and agree with it, and now with another comment, I can't find out which way is down. I think we are looking down at the debris, aren't we?

 

[Joe Neubarth]

In that photo, which way is up and which way is down?

 

[Joe Neubarth]

Fuel bundles blown up and around during explosion then super heats and melts, flows to the side . How would that defy gravity ?

Shogun, if that is the side of a wall, how come everything is stuck to it?

 

[shogun338]

Boy, once you plant the thought in my mind, it does look like melted lead flowing over the debris.

Like the Chernobyl Elephants foot .

 

[shogun338]

Shogun, if that is the side of a wall, how come everything is stuck to it?

What I'm saying is if a fuel bundle where laying there from the explosion and it melted it would flow across the floor of the room . Like when you spill a cup of water on a table.

 

[shogun338]

First I get a thought suggested and agree with it, and now with another comment, I can't find out which way is down. I think we are looking down at the debris, aren't we?

Yes looking down on to one of the floors . Here is a video link of it. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=30c_1301689134

 

[Cire]

Could this be melted spent fuel 2 flowing out of 1 in this pic of Reactor #4 ?

It's laying on top of the fire suppression piping that was on the roof. It's likely roof sheeting or a barrier material installed in the roof. You can see several sharp "folds" in the material and its laying very flat over top of a very uneven surface.

A melted material would not behave in this manner. You would have flow channels, depressions, hanging drips, etc.

 

[TCups]

REGARDING THE NEW PHOTOS OF SFP4

There re significant new clues here regarding the direction and magnitude of the blast, the precise layout of the pool, what is probably in the pool, and to some extent, how the damage to the external south side of Bldg 4 occurred. The exercise this time is left for others. Don't forget to look back and reference other views. Have you made folders for photos of each of the Bldgs yet? Are you adding the links to the new videos as they become available?

PS: Low-lying smoke in a pool of stagnant air can look like melted flowing lead, I think.

Goodnight.

 

[shogun338]

Has anyone found a video of Unit 4 exploding ? With all the cameras around this thing I don't believe it was not filmed .

 

[TCups]

Has anyone found a video of Unit 4 exploding ? With all the cameras around this thing I don't believe it was not filmed .

It probably was . . . in the IR spectrum by NSA satellites. It was dark at the time. Does the NSA have a website?

 

[shogun338]

Unit # 4 photo . Lower levels destroyed .

 

[Joe Neubarth]

It's laying on top of the fire suppression piping that was on the roof. It's likely roof sheeting or a barrier material installed in the roof. You can see several sharp "folds" in the material and its laying very flat over top of a very uneven surface.

A melted material would not behave in this manner. You would have flow channels, depressions, hanging drips, etc.

You obviously have never seen melted lead, have you?

 

[ZZR Puig]

What I'm saying is if a fuel bundle where laying there from the explosion and it melted it would flow across the floor of the room . Like when you spill a cup of water on a table.

You should remember that UO₂ melts above 2800ºC, so almost any other material in contact with it would likely melt before it does, and it would glow a brightly warm white.

 

[ZZR Puig]

You speak from, both a lack of data and desire for amortization, I don't advocate rash choices, but consider the human cost in decisions made. Precaution is both expensive and warranted in this case. Unknowns equal unacceptable risks for me and mine.

Sure, there is a human cost in decisions, that is precisely what I'm talking about. For instance, if I recall the numbers correctly, the number of voluntary abortions following Chernobyl accident due to fears of genetic abnormalities could be counted in the hundreds of thousands. However, no increase of such anomalies was detected among the children that did born after the accident. I'm not against abortion, but hundreds of thousand of wanted babies were prevented to come into this world just because of fear and misinformation. And today, those (mostly old people) who defied evacuation zones and ended returning to their homes around Chernobyl are more healthy than those still relocated, mainly due to social and psychological problems and their related health effects on the latter.

Sorry to insist on that, but this kind of comments seem to imply that some of us are not wishing and trying to do our best, within our modest capabilities, for those suffering these difficult circumstances. We may differ in opinions, but I feel that doubts about intentions could even be offensive.

 

[Joe Neubarth]

You should remember that UO₂ melts above 2800ºC, so almost any other material in contact with it would likely melt before it does, and it would glow a brightly warm white.

That puddle of metal is most likely an amalgam of Zirc, Uranium, Plutonium and other metals Nickle, Iron, Cadmium, Silver) that melted into it. When the explosion happened it was thrown into the air in hundreds of blobs just like that one and came back down with the debris. Since it has other metals entrained it has cooled, just like the Elephant's Foot in the earlier photo, which seemed to have stopped in mid flow. It may have melted some aluminum conduit to add to its mass after it landed, but it sure looks like a blob of metal to me.

 

[Cire]

You obviously have never seen melted lead, have you?

I work with molten lead quite frequently actually. Try tossing it over a stack of randomly oriented pipe and try to come up with flat smooth sheets as seen in the image. (Don't actually attempt to do this.)

 

[TCups]

Unit # 4 photo . Lower levels destroyed .

OK, Shogun338, good. And you are looking at which corner of the destroyed lower levels of Bldg 4?

Can you tell which way the forces of the blast were directed and what structural damage was caused because of it? Where did it come from?

Another exercise for you.

Ignore what anyone else has said and look at this portion of almost the last frame of the video of the overhead "fish eye" camera on the crane. I will attach a shot of it. If you don't know what something is in a photo, start looking for something you do know and use it to gain size, perspective and orientation. What is just above the arrow line? What is just below it? Once you know what is above the line, look for more of it. Check out the layout drawing of the top floor I provided, and think about how thick the wall has to be relative to the size of the pool. Go from there to figure out where the actual pool is, how big it is and what the position of the fuel handling machine is relative to the pool.

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/aerial-floorplan.gif

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/TopFloor-Floorplan.jpg

PS: leave the metallurgy to Joe to figure out from the photos, and concentrate on identifying structures you can name and place for sure.

Start here:

 

[AtomicWombat]

The latest IAEA updates on Chernobyl that I have read are still unable to demonstrate statistically an increase in latent cancers other than the thyroid cancers and acute dose cases early in the event. If you have later information I'll add it to the list of other new reports I have found while following this thread.

I've inadvertently openned a can of worms. It appears there is huge disagreement on the population health impacts of Chernobyl in the scientific literature.

A large Russian study from 2007 was translated and published in 2009 in the Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, a prestigious journal. It is available here:
http://www.strahlentelex.de/Yablokov%20Chernobyl%20book.pdf"

This Russian study reviews over 1,000 published research papers - most by Eastern European researchers written in Slavic languages - as well as a large number of internet and otherwise published documents on the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. The authors claim that a large body of research literature from Eastern Europe has been downplayed or ignored by the IAEA.

Among other health and environmental consequences, the Russian study concludes, "...the overall mortality for the period from April 1986 to the end of 2004 from the Chernobyl catastrophe was estimated at 985,000 additional deaths."

In contrast, in 2005 the IAEA estimated about 4,000 Chernobyl-realted deaths.

The IAEA has been criticised (by Christopher Busby among others) as being biased by its pro-nuclear industry stance; whilst those supporting a higher estimate (eg. Busby) have been criticised as being biased by an ideology that opposes nuclear power.

See also:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amory-lovins/nuclear-power-fukushima-_b_837643.html"

I am a statistician with research skills, so I could review the literature myself, but it's an enormous task. So I'll simply point out there are two strongly opposed views with substantial backing.

 

[orndorf]

http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures/slideshow?articleId=USRTR2KAAL#a=1

39 pictures from inside and outside the plant.

 

[TCups]

I've inadvertently openned a can of worms. It appears there is huge disagreement on the population health impacts of Chernobyl in the scientific literature.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/04/24/1050777345385.html

Worms find Chernobyl fallout a 'turn on'

April 24 2003

Kiev: The Chernobyl nuclear disaster has radically changed the lives of worms in the region, which now enjoy more sex, Ukrainian scientists said today.

Enough said.

 

[razzz]

With news reporting like this, we will never know what's going on.

...Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) said it had found a crack in a concrete pit that was leaking water at its No.2 reactor in Fukushima, measuring 1,000 millisieverts of radiation per hour.

"With radiation levels rising in the seawater near the plant, we have been trying to confirm the reason why, and in that context, this could be one source," said Hidehiko Nishiyama, deputy head of the Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA).

He cautioned, however: "We can't really say for certain until we've studied the results."

TEPCO poured concrete into the pit to stop the leak, but water prevented it from hardening and the leak had yet to be stopped, public broadcaster NHK said...

From...http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/world/9124045/leak-found-in-reactor-pit-as-japan-pm-tours-disaster-zone/

Water is the catalyst for cement, so much for detailed details. And I take it the high reading means the contaminated water comes directly from core material or can one lone fuel rod (damaged/exposed) produce a similar reading (1,000 millisieverts of radiation per hour)?

 

[TCups]

http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures/slideshow?articleId=USRTR2KAAL#a=1

39 pictures from inside and outside the plant.

Lots of helpful new photos here to assist in figuring out what happened at Unit 4, and a couple of new views of the fuel handling machine crash site at Unit 3. Thanks.

Interesting photo here --
http://www.reuters.com/news/pictures/slideshow?articleId=USRTR2KAAL#a=4

 

[AntonL]

First Casualties

http://www.tepco.co.jp/cc/press/11040301-j.html[/URL] (machine translated)]

The impact of Tohoku region Pacific Ocean earthquake that occurred on March 11, 2011 Tokyo Electric Power Company on April 3, 2011, in the turbine building Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 4, two of our employees in the field study now missing. The Company will continue the work we have searched every effort so far, about 53 minutes and 25 minutes at around 3:00 pm and 3:00 pm on March 30 this year, said the two employees in the building basement was discovered, was confirmed dead by yesterday. We pray for your name along with two employees who died, and your family would like everyone's deepest sympathies. <Our people died> Kokubo Kazuhiko (National Kazuhiko com) like (age 24) Nozomi Terashima Shiyou first operation and management of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (or the light of the assigned), like (21) of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station more than one operation control unitPress Releases
Despite President Katsumata Tsunehisa tsunami hit Tokyo Electric Power Company on April 3, 2011, the loss of two young employees who tried to protect the safety of the plant, and the height of contrition Dearimasu. For the deceased, pray for us as well as deep, Our condolences to his family respectfully represent. Our Ino Takashi deceased to death, and vow to never repeat such a tragedy, for the convergence Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accidents, heart and soul is willing to Katamuke. Please rest in peace please. And over

I am sure I speak for all members here that our condolences are extended to the families of the deceased

 

[orndorf]

RIP.

Bit early for a cause of death i assume.

 

[Joe Neubarth]

I work with molten lead quite frequently actually. Try tossing it over a stack of randomly oriented pipe and try to come up with flat smooth sheets as seen in the image. (Don't actually attempt to do this.)

You tossed a five hundred pound blob of nearly solid amalgam of metal and it did not stick together? Or you tossed a few ounces of high temperature lead that pours freely like cream and you say there is a difference. In that case I would agree with you, but you have not made a point other than the fact that you want to belabor the issue ad infinitum. that looks like a melted but now solidified mass of metal to me.What does it look like to you again?

 

[Godzilla1985]

Cause of death was probably tsunami - victims showed lots of blood loss. Although, I don't recall hearing of two missing workers throughout this time, so I'm kinda surprised.

 

[orndorf]

Cause of death was probably tsunami - victims showed lots of blood loss. Although, I don't recall hearing of two missing workers throughout this time, so I'm kinda surprised.

Not much point in speculating on the cause but i heard they were doing duct work inside one of the reactors when they went missing.

 

[AntonL]

Cause of death was probably tsunami - victims showed lots of blood loss. Although, I don't recall hearing of two missing workers throughout this time, so I'm kinda surprised.

correct

The plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Co. said the same day that two workers in their 20s who had been missing since the March 11 killer quake and tsunami that crippled the power station were found dead in the basement of a reactor's building last Wednesday.

 

[Godzilla1985]

Is it true that their dosimeters max out at 1,000 mSv?

 

[warren_c]

FWIW.
This chart might be useful to those worrying about radiation exposure:

http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/radiation-dosage-chart/

It puts radiation dose levels in perspective and in context. With out political bias from either side of the nuclear energy debate.

 

[Reno Deano]

This picture worries me:
http://english.kyodonews.jp/photos/2011/04/82781.html

If the military takes these precautions - why do we still see workers on the ground in lot less protection?

---------------------------

Evidently you have not been on a boat on the water, with wind blowing. The boat is constantly taking in water and discharging it. BTW, the area they are traversing is in the release zone of the reactors in crisis.

 

[TCups]

PROPOSED MECHANISM FOR BLAST AND DAMAGE AT BLDG 4

Please note that this diagram has been modified from the original.

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/Picture30-4.png

Suppose that fuel was being loaded into a cask in the bottom of the small pool adjacent to the main SFP 4. Suppose also, that it was the smaller volume of water in the adjacent pool that boiled off long before the large pool. If that cask and the rods it contains overheat and lead to an explosion (maybe from just thermal damage to the concrete, or what ever), the bulk of the SFP4 is protected by its thick reinforced walls. So the smaller pool explosion goes instead straight up and somewhat to the east, through the transfer slot, and blows out the bottom, north, south and east walls of the small pool. When it does, the force of the explosion can be transmitted to the relatively weak outer walls of the upper floors along the lift shaft on the west and south sides of Bldg 4, out the tunnel door and into the lower floors of the building, around the heavy reinforced structure of the primary containment vessel.

Suppose also that perhaps not visible on the early satellite photos, the concussion wave from the earlier explosion at the southeast corner of Building 3 has done structural damage to the northeast corner of Bldg 4, perhaps cracking some of the concrete panels and weight bearing columns. The blast from inside the building would then tend to do more damage at the northeast corner as well.

Is the cask that would be in the bottom of that transfer cooling pool adjacent to the main SFP4 intended to be used as a temporary means to transfer older spent fuel rods over a very brief time to the larger SFP7 in back of the main facility? If so, and if there were a "fail in place" accident that left the cask, open or closed, in a very small pool that lost cooling water, what would the consequences be? Need to know more about those casks and procedures for transferring fuel rods.

Also, look back at the early photos before the large crane-like structure is brought into spray water on the SFP of 4 -- lots of debris on the ground. But when the crane has been put in place, it looks like a dozer has cleared the debris from the ground and perhaps metal plates have been laid on the ground before the large hose crane is brought in. Did high level waste on the ground delay placement of that crane and hose until it could be cleared:

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/WestElevation.png

DID THIS HAPPEN AT UNIT 4?

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/Picture31.png

Debunk it, please.

 

[warren_c]

High resolution photos from Air Photo Service Co. Ltd., Japan. aerial photo drone :
http://cryptome.org/eyeball/daiichi-npp/daiichi-photos.htm

 

[AntonL]

Attached photos of >1Sv flowing into the ocean