Jet Engine Intakes: Why the Squashed, Flat Design?

In summary, the flattened appearance of jet engine intakes is not a new concept, as it was first seen on German jets at the end of World War II. This shape is necessary to provide enough runway clearance for larger engines that were introduced in the 1970s and 1980s. In some cases, such as with the Rolls Royce Trent 900 engines, special measures may need to be taken to ensure enough ground clearance.
  • #1
Alan G
1
0
I half remember that jet engine intakes were circular a few years ago. Now they have a squashed appearance with the bottom part quite flat.

This isn't new as the first German jet at the end of World War II had the same shape but it seems relatively new on airline jet engines.

So, why are they this shape?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
Runway clearance.

Many aircraft built during the 1970s and 1980s, such as the 737, have engines that do not appear perfectly round when seen from the front. This is because the bottom of the engine cowling (or covering) has to have clearance above the runway so that it does not scrape along the ground. When the 737 first appeared in the 1960s, it had fairly small turbojet engines that were suspended high above the ground. As the engines became larger with the introduction of turbofans, the fuselage and wing remained the same height above the ground, so the bottom of the engine cowling was flattened somewhat to still achieve the maximum air intake without scraping the ground


http://www.century-of-flight.freeol... of technology/Noise Reduction Technology.htm



As an aside, when they were testing the Rolls Royce Trent 900 engines for use on the new Airbus A380, the test plane had such little ground clearance beneath the engines that they allegedly put extra air in the tyres to get another couple of inches clearance.
 
  • #3


The squashed, flat design of jet engine intakes is actually not a new concept, as you mentioned with the first German jet having a similar shape. This design has been around for decades and has several important functions that make it the preferred choice for modern jet engines.

Firstly, the squashed, flat shape allows for better aerodynamic performance. The flat bottom surface helps to create a smooth, laminar flow of air into the engine, reducing drag and increasing efficiency. This is especially important at high speeds where any added resistance can greatly impact the performance of the engine.

Secondly, the flattened bottom also creates a larger surface area for the engine to capture and compress air. This allows for a greater volume of air to be processed, resulting in more power and thrust being produced by the engine.

Additionally, the squashed design also helps to reduce the overall size and weight of the engine. By flattening the bottom, the engine can be positioned closer to the ground, allowing for a shorter and more compact design. This is important for aircraft manufacturers who are always looking for ways to reduce weight and improve fuel efficiency.

Furthermore, the flattened bottom also allows for easier maintenance and access to the engine. Mechanics can easily inspect and service the engine without having to navigate around a circular intake.

In conclusion, the squashed, flat design of jet engine intakes is a result of years of research and development to create the most efficient and high-performing engines. It offers benefits such as improved aerodynamics, increased air intake, reduced size and weight, and easier maintenance. So, while it may seem like a recent trend, this design has been a crucial aspect of jet engine technology for decades.
 

FAQ: Jet Engine Intakes: Why the Squashed, Flat Design?

1. What is the purpose of the squashed, flat design in jet engine intakes?

The squashed, flat design in jet engine intakes helps to maintain a constant, smooth airflow into the engine, which is crucial for efficient combustion and thrust generation.

2. How does the squashed, flat design impact the performance of the jet engine?

The squashed, flat design reduces the amount of turbulent airflow entering the engine, resulting in improved efficiency and increased thrust. This design also helps to reduce drag, allowing the aircraft to fly at higher speeds.

3. What are the factors that determine the optimal shape and size of jet engine intakes?

The shape and size of jet engine intakes are determined by various factors such as the aircraft's speed and altitude, engine type, and desired performance. The design must also consider factors like air pressure, temperature, and humidity to ensure efficient operation.

4. How does the design of jet engine intakes differ between different types of aircraft?

The design of jet engine intakes can vary depending on the type of aircraft and its intended use. For example, military fighter jets may have more angular and streamlined intakes to reduce radar detection, while commercial airliners may have larger and more rounded intakes for better efficiency at cruising speeds.

5. Are there any drawbacks to the squashed, flat design in jet engine intakes?

While the squashed, flat design offers many benefits, it does have some drawbacks. This design can be more susceptible to foreign object damage and may require more frequent maintenance due to the increased potential for debris to enter the engine. Additionally, this design may not be as effective in very high-altitude conditions.

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
11K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
966
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top