Jet Fuels: JP-8 (3773) vs. JP-8 (4177)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Saladsamurai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jet
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the distinctions between JP-8 (3773) and JP-8 (4177) jet fuels, specifically their identification as POSF samples from Wright Patterson A/F Base. JP-8 is a kerosene-based fuel with additives, but the specific differences between the two variants are not well-documented. The user seeks clarity on the numbering convention, which appears to be non-standard, with 3774 following 3773. A reference document detailing the composition of JP-8 (3773) is provided, but no similar documentation for JP-8 (4177) exists.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of jet fuel types and specifications
  • Familiarity with fuel composition and additives
  • Knowledge of military fuel identification systems
  • Basic research skills for accessing technical documentation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the composition and properties of JP-8 (3773) and JP-8 (4177)
  • Investigate the role of additives in JP-8 jet fuel
  • Explore military fuel identification systems and their conventions
  • Access databases or documentation from Wright Patterson A/F Base
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, military fuel specialists, and anyone involved in the procurement or analysis of jet fuels will benefit from this discussion.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
Can anybody point me in the direction of some documentation that can help me to distinguish between these two fuels? I have been searching for hours and I keep coming across articles that use these as sample fuels in experiments, but none that actually describes the numbering convention?

I understand that JP-8 Jet A + additives, but what are the differences between the JP-8's themselves?

I have also see it as JP-8 POSF 3773 and JP-8 POSF 4177.

Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The POSF numbers appear to be identifiers for specific fuel samples from Wright Patterson A/F Base, produced by different methods.

This gives the composition of 3773 (and two others, but not 4177).

http://idea.library.drexel.edu/bitstream/1860/3125/1/Kurman%20_Matthew%20S.pdf

I suspect there isn't any "numbering convention", except that 3774 is the next sample after 3773.

Presumably WPAB keeps a database ...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
65K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K