John Oliver on science

  • Thread starter micromass
  • Start date
  • #1
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
22,178
3,314
Very funny and insightful video:

 
  • Like
Likes StevieTNZ, ShayanJ, Greg Bernhardt and 3 others

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Psinter
275
787
The cool thing I find about that guy in my opinion is how he manages to compress to less than half an hour a lengthy subject (of anything he talks about) and still make it precise, accurate, informational, and attractive to hear.

I say "he manages to compress", but there's probably a whole team working on and stuff (perhaps helping with editing and such).
 
  • #3
Drakkith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
22,059
6,140
Haha! Nice!
 
  • #4
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,867
4,838
His criticism of how the media sensationalizes 'new' studies, or any study, or otherwise portrays science or scientists, is warranted.

And then there is the pressure on the part of many to publish. I often see the same paper published in different journals without much new information, and sometimes, the same work is published at multiple conferences.

I know of some cases were reviewers rejected papers that were subsequently published, and so, sometimes, garbage gets published.
 
  • #5
micromass
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
22,178
3,314
I know of some cases were reviewers rejected papers that were subsequently published, and so, sometimes, garbage gets published.

Just because a reviewer rejects a paper, that doesn't mean it shouldn't get published. It's a big red flag though.
 
  • #6
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
20,867
4,838
Just because a reviewer rejects a paper, that doesn't mean it shouldn't get published. It's a big red flag though.
Two reviewers rejected the paper, and there was some problems with the work, not to mention that the paper failed to address something that in the paper was claimed would be addressed. One of the authors was a former student of the editor of the prestigious international journal. But I digress.

Three of Oliver's criticisms are how the media portrays science, or scientific studies, how popsci trivializes science, and in some cases, how some institutions or individuals misrepresent scientific matters or mislead the public.
 
Last edited:

Suggested for: John Oliver on science

Replies
1
Views
244
Replies
12
Views
544
Replies
1
Views
262
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
451
Replies
14
Views
253
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
580
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
512
Replies
86
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
374
Replies
5
Views
445
Top