- #1

Mohamad&Issa

- 22

- 0

**"K" in Coulomb's law**

Hi I want to ask how we can get k in Coulomb's law.

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- Thread starter Mohamad&Issa
- Start date

- #1

Mohamad&Issa

- 22

- 0

Hi I want to ask how we can get k in Coulomb's law.

- #2

Simon Bridge

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 17,874

- 1,657

Welcome to PF;

k is an empirical constant like the acceleration of gravity - you can look it up.

$$k=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}$$

- #3

haael

- 538

- 35

The Coulomb constant is in fact the coupling constant of electric interaction.

Its numerical value depends on the charge unit. When you redefine the charge unit (coulomb) this constant will change. If you take the electron (elemental) charge as the base unit, you will get the fine structure constant. If you get the Planck charge as the unit, you will get 1.

- #4

Simon Bridge

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 17,874

- 1,657

Pretty much like anything you measure ten? Numercal value depends on the units you use - how you measure it.Its numerical value depends on the charge unit.

- #5

haael

- 538

- 35

Yes, but I meant: the Coulomb constant is a definition of our charge unit, in a sense. It does not say anything about reality. It just says about us - namely about our unit system. This is just a force that two particles of one unit charge extert one on another.Pretty much like anything you measure ten? Numercal value depends on the units you use - how you measure it.

- #6

Simon Bridge

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 17,874

- 1,657

So what you are saying is that since the actual value of something depends on our unit system, then the actual value says something about our unit system...?

Perhaps you mean that scale factors are not part of "reality"? Or just this particular one?

I have seen engineering texts decrying the SI system requirement for the permittivity of free space - saying there is no need for such a thing in the unit systems they are used to.

- #7

haael

- 538

- 35

Suppose that you have 2 equivalent descriptions of reality and a transformation between them. The "reality" is the thing that is unchanged under this transformation. Everything else is not "reality", it is just a trait of that particular description.Perhaps you mean that scale factors are not part of "reality"? Or just this particular one?

One example of pure mathematical trait is a coordinate system. The second one is a unit system. You can pick several different theories in several different coordinate systems with several different units. All they mean the same. If you have some property that holds only in one of these formulations and not in others, then this is not a physical law. It's just a mathematical artifact of the theory, just as unimportant as the color of the ink in your pen you have chosen to write the theory with.

In this particular case:

$$F = K q_1 q_2 / r^2$$ - this is a physical law. It holds in all unit systems, with different numerical values of the parameters.

$$K = 8.987551787368176$$ - this is not a physical law. This is just one particular formulation. I can provide a different formulation where this does not hold.

- #8

Mohamad&Issa

- 22

- 0

Thank you.

- #9

Simon Bridge

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

- 17,874

- 1,657

Cool - hopefully the question got answered in all that ;)

Share:

- Last Post

- Replies
- 10

- Views
- 499

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 442

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 384

- Last Post

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 673

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 628

- Last Post

- Replies
- 2

- Views
- 203

- Last Post

- Replies
- 6

- Views
- 1K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 2K

- Replies
- 5

- Views
- 360

- Replies
- 4

- Views
- 1K