- #1
RAD4921
- 347
- 1
It seems to me that the problem of evil in philosophy can only be applied to western religions and not where karma is a belief. IS this true?
selfAdjoint said:It seems to me that you have to have free will at some level to have evil. Something that is just predetermined cannot really becalled evil no matter how awful we find it (earthquake, hurricane, tornado). In the west we not only believe ourselves to have free will, we attribute that also to our god(s).
RAD4921 said:It seems to me that the problem of evil in philosophy can only be applied to western religions and not where karma is a belief. IS this true?
RingoKid said:Doris, the spider, and Jim are separate entities. As reincarnations their karma account starts from zero again.
RingoKid said:Do spiders and viruses have free will ?
hypnagogue said:Please support any claims you have about Karma is supposed to be or do with evidence from a reputable source. We all have some idea of what is meant by the term, but I don't trust generic concepts to faithfully capture the intended meaning of the word in its original context.
RingoKid said:what would you call a reputable source Tom and could you or Hypno please post an example of one and what makes it reputable ?
Also what exactly would you like explained with relevence to the opening post ?
RingoKid said:what would you call a reputable source Tom and could you or Hypno please post an example of one and what makes it reputable ?
Also what exactly would you like explained with relevence to the opening post ?
RingoKid said:It should be obvious already that I answered the initial question in light of the definition and then some.
I have proven an understanding of the philosophical system in which it arose. The fact that no one has taken me to task over my answer suggests it is correct
The unpleasant sensation of wishing to cause pain was not intiated by me. My motive and intent were pure. I tend not to attempt to deal, I just deal and let the cards fall where they may.
If the game is tit for tat though then i am quite adept at that also.
RAD4921 said:It seems to me that the problem of evil in philosophy can only be applied to western religions and not where karma is a belief. IS this true?
RingoKid said:karma at it's most basic is cause and effect, choice and consequence and it is cumulative
karma can then be awarded as positive or negative with the effects/consequences of negative karma being equivalent to evil and vice versa.
NO
RingoKid said:karma at it's most basic is cause and effect, choice and consequence and it is cumulative
karma can then be awarded as positive or negative with the effects/consequences of negative karma being equivalent to evil and vice versa.
NO
RingoKid said:definition
I like playing games. Games are fun. Fun is happiness. Happiness is what it's all about. Adults should play games more often they'd be a lot happier. Don't you agree ?
Karma is a concept in many Eastern religions and philosophies that refers to the concept of cause and effect. It suggests that our actions in this life will have consequences in the next life, whether positive or negative. In the problem of evil, karma is often used to explain why bad things happen to good people or why there is suffering in the world. It suggests that individuals may be experiencing negative consequences in this life due to actions in a previous life.
The concept of karma differs from the idea of a benevolent God in that it does not involve a deity or higher power. Karma is seen as a natural law of cause and effect, rather than a conscious decision made by a divine being. This can be a challenge for some individuals who struggle with the problem of evil, as they may not find comfort in the idea that their suffering is a result of their own actions rather than a part of a greater divine plan.
Some individuals may use karma to justify the existence of evil in the world by suggesting that it is necessary for individuals to experience negative consequences in order to learn and grow. However, this perspective can be problematic as it can imply that individuals who experience suffering or hardships are somehow deserving of it. It also does not address the issue of innocent individuals who may experience suffering despite not having committed any negative actions in this life or a previous one.
Karma is not a scientifically proven concept, as it is based on religious and philosophical beliefs rather than empirical evidence. While some studies have explored the potential effects of karma on individuals' behavior and well-being, there is no concrete evidence to support the existence of karma as a universal force or law.
Reconciling the idea of karma with the problem of evil can be a complex and personal journey. Some individuals may find comfort in the belief that their actions in this life will have consequences in the next, while others may struggle with the idea of deserving suffering due to actions in a previous life. Ultimately, the reconciliation of these two concepts may vary for each individual based on their own beliefs and perspectives.