Kepler's 2nd Law

d2A/dt2=0
or
dA/dt=k=rv/2

L=r x p
L/m=r x v
L/(2m)=(r x v)/2

How does dA/dt relate to L?
In a certain book, it says dA/dt=H/2 where H=L/m=rv
but L is a vector and H is not.
 
566
6
dA/dt = L/(2m) = constant

So where's the problem?
m is a constant; r x v is constant.:wink:
 
L is a vector. So is dA/dt=L/(2m) where L=|L|?
Besides L/(2m)=(1/2)(r x v). Is it correct to say
|L/(2m)|=(1/2)|r|*|v|=rv/2=dA/dt?

edit:
Sorry, found the problem. |r x v|=RVsinA and since r and v are always perpendicular. |r|*|v|=RVsinpi/2=RV
So, |L/(2m)|=(1/2)|r|*|v|=rv/2=dA/dt
Right?

edit:
"since r and v are always perpendicular"
but wouldn't that only work for circular orbits?
 
Last edited:

enigma

Aerospace Engineer
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,732
8
I don't have my orbital dynamics book on me and some of your variables are using different characters than I'm used to seeing (I'm using Vallado).

What are you defining L , H, and m to be?

r and v are usually _not_ perpendicular. The only cases where they are, are either a) circular orbit or b) sat. is at apoapsis or periapsis.
 
566
6
Originally posted by StephenPrivitera


edit:
Sorry, found the problem. |r x v|=RVsinA and since r and v are always perpendicular.
Right?
Wrong; you are correct that it is the cross product; but r and v are not always perpendicular.
r x v does NOT mean v is always perpendicular to r!!
By taking the cross product you are, in effect, by definition, taking the perpendicular component of v. The calculation requires using the perpendicular component of the velocity.

edit:
"since r and v are always perpendicular"
but wouldn't that only work for circular orbits?
Correct,Stephen, the orbit would be circular IF and only if v were always perpendicular to r; but it is not.
However, inspite of that, we still always use the perpendicular component of v FOR THE PURPOSE OF CALCULATING dA/dt.
This is necessary because L is defined in the same manner, that is, by taking the perpendicular component of the tangental orbital velocity. L= (r x mv)= (r)*(m)*(v)sin@

Did that make sense??
Creator :wink:
 
Last edited:

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top