1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Kepler's 3rd law

  1. Feb 23, 2015 #1

    Suraj M

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    While proving Kepler's 3rd law we get the equation
    $$ \frac{ΔA}{Δt} = \frac{2L}{m}$$
    we say L and m are constant,so aerial velocity is constant!
    But consider a body going around a black hole really quickly, then the mass would not be constant, right?
    So is Kepler's 3rd law violated or am i missing something?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 23, 2015 #2

    phyzguy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Kepler's laws are a consequence of Newtonian Mechanics. They don't hold in the case of strong gravity or velocities close to the speed of light. For example as you get close to a black hole, there is a radius (clued the ISCO, for Innermost Stable Circular Orbit) within which there are no possible stable orbits. This is still outside of the event horizon.
     
  4. Feb 23, 2015 #3

    Suraj M

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Oh Okay, is there some defined relation that works in all realistic cases, relating Time period and radius?
     
  5. Feb 23, 2015 #4

    phyzguy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Kepler's laws work really well in almost all realistic cases. I suspect it is very difficult to find an astronomical case where the velocity is so high or the gravity so strong that Kepler's laws don't apply. In the relativistic case (velocities close to the speed of light, or very strong gravity), I don't think there is any general rule like Kepler's laws. You have to work out each case.
     
  6. Feb 23, 2015 #5

    Suraj M

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I guess the object would just get torn apart due to the gravitational force, before we calculate anything!
     
  7. Feb 24, 2015 #6

    A.T.

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The object could be small which would make tidal forces negligible, but its trajectory could still be highly non-Newtonian.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Loading...
Similar Threads for Kepler's
B How to get tangential velocity