Over in "Theoretical" forum a new poster kikuchiyo put up two animated pictures of time.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

A. http://homepage.mac.com/aglaser/time.swf [Broken]

B. http://homepage.mac.com/aglaser/time2.swf [Broken]

one is the time-line picture and the other is the falling-leaves picture

I think one's focus should not be "Which picture is right?" but

"How do I understand the falling leaves picture?"

In mathematical terms the difference is between a "linear ordering" and a "partial ordering" relation

if two leaves overlap you can tell which precedes which

and presumably its a transitive relation (yes, kikuchiyo?) which

means that if A precedes B precedes C then A precedes C

the partial ordering idea has interested mathematicians and they have learned some things about partial orderings

there is also the idea of a "directed set" which is a little stronger than a partial ordering but still not a linear ordering----a directed set allows taking limits and some interesting collections of things turn out to be partial-ordered and in some cases directed.

It seems like not a bad idea to see if time can be understood in these terms

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Kikuchiyo's two pictures of time

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**